TODAY! The House Votes on Auditing the Federal Reserve

[Dee]

Just listened to an interview of Ron Paul concerning auditing the Federal Reserve. It is before the House TODAY, and he thinks it will pass the House. He also thinks that if it fails in the Senate, it will lose them votes in 2010. Hmmmmmm I guess that means the Republicans will take over.
It is HIGH TIME, that the Federal Reserve DOES GET AUDITED. THEY ARE THE REAL WORLD POWER, AND CONTROL NOT JUST OUR ECONOMY AND GOVERNMENT, BUT MUCH OF THE WORLD. We shall see.

[Questor]

I remember working at one of the Federal Reserve regional banks. There was one hall I walked down in the basement and it usually had one or two 4 foot by 4 foot by 4 foot pallets of cash that was going to be destroyed because it was worn out. That's a lot of money.

This would be a good time to audit them because they are very busy now. Their busy cycle is opposite that of the general business cycle. When things are bad, banks are failing or in trouble, so the Fed gets busy. When times are good the Fed has time to work on other projects that they've been planning.

[Yankee1]

Hi Dee
   You have hit the nail right on the head. To go one step further
Mr Rothschild controls the Federal Reserve through his agents like
JP Morgans banks which are privately owned Federal Reserve banks.
And yes they do control the worlds purse strings.
                                    Yankee1

[BBF]

If you think that any of that even phases them you are an optemist. They are a private entity with very influential members that have all the strings that need pulling in their hands that either nothing comes of it or they are found to be sqeaky clean.

[Squib]

I do think they'll come out ahead, but I don't think they'll be unscathed if the audit goes through.  if they do go down they'll not go alone.  scary, but needed and deserved.


maybe the best of punishment and failure had be RESERVEd for last ... okay that was lame but it felt good to say 

[blind ear]

We need laws for calrity of all corporate ownership of both public AND private corporations to expose the power net that is hidden by the veil of secrecy described as "rights of privacy of private ownership." It would expose leverage fraud, derivative fraud and monopoly fraud.

The SEC doesn't have the manpower or the level of knowledge/intelligence to catch the crooks. Exposeing the whole ball of wax to the public is the only way they will be caught. Look at Berney Madolff (sp). The SEC was told about him for two years before they figured out he was a crook.

Next/also address the Federal Reserve.

eddiegjr

[Cabin4]

Since criminals far outnumber the non-criminals in Washington, it's highly unlikely this legislation could ever pass. This new administration has ushered in new approaches to stealing the tax payers money. The criminals are in control and It's hard to believe they will allow themselves to be exposed in an audit. In fact, we have proof that these people are stealing today, and nothing is done about it. Sen. Dodd should be thrown out of office and in jail and yet the guy is still running around, emboldened by the fact nothing is done about his stealing, and he just continues to conspire to steal and cheat using the legislative process to his own personal advantage and that of his donor corporations.. Tim Guetner the guy in charge of guarding the American treasure chest of tax dollars, is actually in charge of specifically creating methods and process to circumvent Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitutional process on appropriations. Congressman Rangles, who is responsible for creating proposed federal tax law changes, is actually in charge of creating loop holes for himself, Obama, their donor corporations and the super rich. Obama’s so call “American Reinvestment Act” (fake stimulus and stealing program) was nothing more than a $1 trillion dollar legislative theft of our tax dollars to shovel money to worthless projects run by union jobs and bail out teachers pension programs just to name a few.

I see no reason why this will ever stop. It’s like the mafia bosses sitting around at a table and agreeing to let the FBI take part in their meetings. Do I hope is passes, yes. Am I hopeful, no

[blind ear]

Cabin4, I think historically you are probably right. We are easily led to ends that are not for our good. There are a lot of candidates out there that are looking for support. I send a vote of confidence to many of them. (a $5 or $10 donation to thier cause). They might not make it, but they may. The thing I look for is a tilt toward my way of thinking. If they are conservative and looking for support they might take suggestions. What is/those whom are, in control now offer no hope. Can we with all of our openions reach a compromise consensus rather than clinging to our tunnelvision beliefs of only supporting an obvious winner rather than trying to help push someone to the top that actually thinks as we do? Compromise? We argue only to persuade others to our point of view and no one accepts thinking differently to accomplish progress to a common goal. Our adversaries take small victories to approach a long term goal. They will keep control if we don't adapt our way of thinking. This probably doesn't make sence to most but I have no appologies. eddiegjr

[blind ear]

Death Penalty

As mentioned in another thread, it is a great deterant. They hung horse thieves and bank robbers in the old days? We need to resurrect the practice. Did hanging thieves die because of the bankers stealing more than the robbers?   The robber steals, hang him. The banker steals, hang them. All except not paying income taxes of course!  Wait, that is the banks stealing from us though isn't it.  Isn't it?
Yep, think about it.          
 
eddiegjr