« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?  (Read 659 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline k9jri

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« on: April 23, 2010, 06:24:00 AM »
I just acquired a new to me .223 caliber, Ruger #3 with Ruger #1 wood that I would like to scope.  I have wanted one of these for more than 40 years but I will probably not shoot it a lot therefore I am not looking to put a high dollar Leupold on her.  It will be used for an occasional 50 yard and 100 yard target shoot at the range.  It will not be a hunting gun as I am not a hunter.  It is a beautiful rifle that will be polished more than fired :)

I would like to maintain a flow profile on the scope but the Leupold VX-I 2-7X28 Rimfire scope that I have available does not have long enough eye relief.  It is about 1 - 1.5 " too short for comfortable offhand shooting.

In looking through current scopes I find that the Burris Timberline 3-9X32 has eye relief (3.75" - 5.0") that appears adequate.  Is this an OKAY scope?

Mike
Logged

Offline gcrank1

  • Trade Count: (24)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7644
  • Gender: Male
Re: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« Reply #1 on: April 28, 2010, 08:11:43 AM »
How about some 'extension' rings for the scope you have? I know I have heard of such for Ruger No.1s as this is a common problem.
Logged
"Halt while I adjust my accoutrements!"
      ><   ->
We are only temporary caretakers of the past heading toward an uncertain future
22Mag UV / 22LR  Sportster
357Mag Schuetzen Special
45-70  SS Ultra Hunter with UV cin.lam. wood
12ga. 'Ol' Ugly OverKill', Buck barrel c/w  SpeedStock  and swap 28" x Full bird barrel, 1974

Offline Autorim

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 610
  • Gender: Male
Re: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« Reply #2 on: April 29, 2010, 03:55:45 AM »
I have Millet offset/extension rings on all of my No. 1's and 3's. They work well.
Logged

Offline k9jri

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« Reply #3 on: April 30, 2010, 05:14:20 AM »
Quote from: Autorim on April 29, 2010, 03:55:45 AM
I have Millet offset/extension rings on all of my No. 1's and 3's. They work well.
It looks like that is the way I will have to go.  I have my Leupold FX-III 25X40 Silhouette scope mounted and I still have to really lean into it.  I believe it has as much eye relief as the Burris scopes do.  MY local Gander Mountain has good prices on Millet rings but no offset/extension rings in stock.  I will have to order a pair.

Thanks for both comments on the Millet rings.

- Mike
Logged

Offline Slufoot

  • Trade Count: (21)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1004
Re: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« Reply #4 on: May 01, 2010, 04:36:03 AM »
Quote from: Autorim on April 29, 2010, 03:55:45 AM
I have Millet offset/extension rings on all of my No. 1's and 3's. They work well.

Hey Autorim, I went to Millett's web site and could only find the Ruger extension ring sets for the Model 77 which uses two different height rings as opposed to the #1 using both rings of the same height.

Are you having to buy two complete M77 sets to get one set for the #1 or does Millett have what we need but not listed on thier web site?

Thank you very much!
GOOD SHOOTING!
Slufoot
Logged

Offline S.E.Ak

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (8)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 808
  • Gender: Male
  • Wrangell Ak
Re: Is the 3-9X32 Timberline okay for for a Ruger #3?
« Reply #5 on: May 03, 2010, 09:00:00 AM »
Look at some shotgun scopes,many have more eye relife
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »