Author Topic: Bushnell 3200- 5X15 AO scope?  (Read 539 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline doninva

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 412
  • Gender: Male
Bushnell 3200- 5X15 AO scope?
« on: March 11, 2010, 05:41:36 PM »
I need a scope for my .223 rifle. I bought an Atec 4.4 X 14 with the side focus but it won't focus past 50 yards, so it's headed back to Bushnell, even though it's a Simmons. I would really like a Leupold VXII 4X12 AO but can't swing it right now. I found a 5X15 Bushnell 3200 with AO that looks good but am wondering about the eye relief. Does it change a lot from 5 power to 15 power. This is the best quality of a Leupold IMO, the eye relief is not critical. I have a Weaver 4X16 with AO on it right now but the eye relief is a little to critical. Thanks for any help, Don

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26914
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bushnell 3200- 5X14 AO scope?
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2010, 06:37:32 PM »
Nope not a lot. It's not constant but it is close enough it won't be a problem. I do like the 7-21 E3200 a lot more tho.

Why are you sending a Simmons to Bushnell? I've not heard anything of Bushnell taking them over.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline quickdtoo

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43300
  • Gender: Male
"Always do right, this will gratify some and astonish the rest" -  Mark Twain

Offline doninva

  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 412
  • Gender: Male
Re: Bushnell 3200- 5X14 AO scope?
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2010, 07:54:38 PM »
Yep, when I called, they said send to Bushnell outdoor products. You don't know who owns who anymore :-\. The 7X21 might be a little to much on the low end for what I'm using it for. Thanks,Don