Author Topic: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt  (Read 2661 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline rawhidekid

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #30 on: March 27, 2010, 01:52:58 AM »
The handgun pictured is a 5.5 inch SS Ruger Bisley in 45 Colt.  The Bisley grip gives less flip with recoil so is better with hotter loads.  This particular handgun will shoot the Hornady XTP 300 grain bullets more accuratly than anything else.  I find the 5.5 inch barrel easy to carry as well.  I highly recommend it to all. 8)  Rawhidekid
NRA Life Member, Retired Air Force, Grandfather:   RIA 38 Super, , Vaquaro .357, Golden Boy 39A .22,  54cal GPR, 54 cal Lyman plains pistol, 45 cal Kentucky Rifle perc, 50 cal traditions Hawken Woodsman

Offline Ak.Hiker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #31 on: March 27, 2010, 05:57:29 PM »
I have two Ruger Blackhawks that are 4 5/8 inch. The 44 Magnum is the Super Blackhawk that has the steel grip frame. What I like about the blued 45 Colt is the lighter weight of the aluminum grip frame. It is 8 oz. lighter than the Super Blackhawk with the same length barrel. Even the blued 45 Colt with the 7.5 inch barrel only weighs 40 oz.  If you like heavier guns than the stainless steel model Blackhawk in 45 Colt has a steel grip frame and weighs about the same as the Super Blackhawk. I like to shoot 300 and 320 grain loads in my Super Blackhawk and pretty much stick with the 255 grain Keith load in the 45 Colt. The Blackhawk in 45 Colt can handle the heavyweight 335 grain loads as well. A big fat 335 grain cast bullet at between 950 and 1000 is a good load.   

Offline Blackhawker

  • Trade Count: (38)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1486
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #32 on: March 28, 2010, 03:41:39 AM »
If the grip is a problem, steel or aluminum, one can buy grip frames from Midway, even brass to dress things up. 

Offline Scibaer

  • Central Michigan, USA, Earth
  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
  • FATE FAVORS THE WISE
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #33 on: March 28, 2010, 04:53:05 AM »
 would the brass frame be any stronger then the aluminum ?
 

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #34 on: March 29, 2010, 02:55:54 AM »
The problem i had with the alum. frame is the screws that held it to the frame would get loose . After time the holes would wallow a bit . I don't see brass resisting the wallowing out any better . With a steel frame it was a matter of retighting and replacing screws every so often. I have gone to the Redhawk and not had screws get loose . BTW why shoot a Bisley when a DA has the better grip to start ?
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline rawhidekid

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #35 on: March 29, 2010, 03:17:56 AM »
Why shoot a Bisley?  It gives the recoil of a DA with the better triger of a SA.  Also still has a Western flavor some of us prefer.  As for loosening screws, use blue locktight and that problem is fixed. 8)
NRA Life Member, Retired Air Force, Grandfather:   RIA 38 Super, , Vaquaro .357, Golden Boy 39A .22,  54cal GPR, 54 cal Lyman plains pistol, 45 cal Kentucky Rifle perc, 50 cal traditions Hawken Woodsman

Offline Scibaer

  • Central Michigan, USA, Earth
  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
  • FATE FAVORS THE WISE
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #36 on: March 29, 2010, 09:25:21 AM »
ok time for an update.
  after reading thru all the opinions and advice, i went and picked myself up a ....

wait for it ...
 

a new model blackhawk .in .45 colt  ... see the pic

Offline Ak.Hiker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 389
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #37 on: March 29, 2010, 08:13:42 PM »
Very nice pick.

Offline GH1

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 939
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #38 on: March 30, 2010, 01:23:44 AM »
HAve you considered the .454 Casull?
GH1 :)
I owe my life to an organ donor

Offline Scibaer

  • Central Michigan, USA, Earth
  • Trade Count: (25)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
  • FATE FAVORS THE WISE
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #39 on: March 30, 2010, 02:41:37 AM »
i have actually, concidered the .454
 i have shot one, and they have one heck of a muzzle blast, it dont bother me but i decided i'd move up to a .454 if i needed more then the .44 mag could deliver. the truth is, i had 3 .44 mags and figured i need something else.
 i asked about the 44 vs 45 thing to see if i wanted to just move to the .454 and it sounded like i  wanted to try a .45
so yesterday, i went to the gun shop and seen what they had.
i picked up this .45 for $400 plus tax. its the big brother to the .357mag vaquero i have.
its all steel and with the adjustable sites, it should work well for taking hogs and whitetails, or the ocasional paper target lol

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #40 on: March 30, 2010, 03:22:16 AM »
Nope the loctite didn't work well as one would think . I understand the western like . But for hunting or protection in the woods a DA seems a better choice . And if heavy loads are the order of the day the REDHAWK is stronger than even the SUPER BLACKHAWK.
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline rawhidekid

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 679
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #41 on: March 30, 2010, 03:47:36 AM »
When using loctite it is important to clean both areas before applying then let it set for an hour before use.  8) As for strength it is more inportant to have tight chambers, but that is another topic. ;D
NRA Life Member, Retired Air Force, Grandfather:   RIA 38 Super, , Vaquaro .357, Golden Boy 39A .22,  54cal GPR, 54 cal Lyman plains pistol, 45 cal Kentucky Rifle perc, 50 cal traditions Hawken Woodsman

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #42 on: March 30, 2010, 10:45:46 AM »
i have no problem using loc-tite , understand how to use it . we used red as we knew the gun would be taken apart later . If you shoot volumes of very hot loads the screws loosen . its just what happens . With alum the holes wallow out . I have seen people switch grip frames to ss on guns shot like i noted . I found the SRH to work better and no loose screws .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Redhawk1

  • Life time NRA Supporter.
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (78)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10748
  • Gender: Male
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #43 on: March 30, 2010, 11:50:42 AM »
First as to safety. Ive been loading heavy 45s for rugers for probably 20 years and theres many many others who also have done this. It is completely safe as long as you have any semblance of common sense. If your dumb enough that you wont mark ammo that is gun specific then you dont belong handloading period. I used to run 45s to levels i wont even say here. Well above what even is recomended for large framed rugers and never had a problem. Anymore i dont load even 44s up to the hilt. Mostly my heavy loads in 45s and 44 are something like a 300 at 1100fps. Its not that i dont think the guns are capable its just i never seen where loads heavier then that killed any bettter. Personaly i prefer a 44 and the only reason is ive had better luck in accuracy with all the 44 guns ive owned compared to the 45colt guns. If i had to go down to one revolver it would no doubt be some kind of a 44 mag.

Lloyd, you got it right on all accounts. I personally like the 45 over the 44. My Super Blackhawk is at Reeder's Custom guns being turned into a 5 shot 6 inch beast 45 Colt. If I wanted I could hot rod this way up there like you properly already have, but the reality of it all is, it is not really needed, you and I know that to be fact. Any good handguner would know that as well.

If someone wants to out run the 44 Mag, jump into a 454 Casull...
If  you're going to make a hole, make it a big one.
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Only two defining forces have ever offered to die for you,
Jesus Christ and the American G. I.
One died for your soul, the other for your freedom

Endowment Life Member of the NRA
Life Member NA

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: .44 mag vs. the .45 colt
« Reply #44 on: March 30, 2010, 12:09:49 PM »
I have the 454 and like the Redhawk better for carry in a holster . The 454 to me is a true hand gun not a holster gun . I also like to push the limit some with in reason . I always say if no one pushed the limit we would still be shooting low power rounds with little effect . Keep in mind if no one wanted to best the 44 Colt we would not have a 44 mag. ( Elmer hot rodded the 45 first but switched to 44's as there was more metal in the cyl.). Now we have better metal and can push the 45 to higher limits so why not ? On game I keep my loads for the 45 near the 44 mag. But on the range shooting at distance i like to crank them up a bit .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !