Author Topic: Roman Polanski is a free man. You got a problem with that? (Read 2804 times)

billy_56081 · « **Reply #60 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:31:56 PM »

http://www.ageofconsent.com/mississippi.htm

Wreckhog stop trying to justify yourself. My cousin says that is pretty standard. You are a very sick fellow.

ironglow · « **Reply #61 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:33:12 PM »

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 01:27:41 PM

I also see that the age of consent is 12 in Vatican City. Clever of them priests.

I never made it a practice of checking "age of consent' rules around the world...I have no intention of ever coming anywhere near close to violating the laws which protect children... I would suppose if One were to have intentions of doing so, they would keep a close watch of the various statutes.

wreckhog · « **Reply #62 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:35:08 PM »

http://www.webistry.net/jan/consent.html

I am not familiar with NAMBLA. Are you?

ironglow · « **Reply #63 on:** July 18, 2010, 01:41:15 PM »

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 01:35:08 PM

http://www.webistry.net/jan/consent.html

I am not familiar with NAMBLA. Are you?

Seems we have disagreeing websites..however, real men don't need legal loopholes..they know very well they should protect and not abuse children. In fact, most real men would quickly show the proof of this contention to one who does such things.

Casull · « **Reply #64 on:** July 18, 2010, 02:44:10 PM »

Here you go wreck:

House Bill 834
SECTION 2. Section 97-3-65, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

97-3-65. (1) The crime of statutory rape is committed when:

(a) Any person seventeen (17) years of age or older has sexual intercourse with a child who:

(i) Is at least fourteen (14) but under sixteen (16) years of age;

(ii) Is thirty-six (36) or more months younger than the person; and

(iii) Is not the person's spouse; or

(b) A person of any age has sexual intercourse with a child who:

(i) Is under the age of fourteen (14) years;

(ii) Is twenty-four (24) or more months younger than the person; and

(iii) Is not the person's spouse.

(c) Neither the victim's consent nor the victim's lack of chastity is a defense to a charge of statutory rape.

04/14/98 Approved by Governor

And, in fact, if the child is under 14, the pervert has committed a capital offense.

ironglow · « **Reply #65 on:** July 18, 2010, 03:07:45 PM »

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 01:20:00 PM

Nope. You and Casull are incorrect. It is also 14 in at least one other state. Kinda sucks to be wrong don't it?

Seeing Casull's above post (Missippi 9-3-65), we can see why you believe it sucks to be wrong...

billy_56081 · « **Reply #66 on:** July 18, 2010, 03:37:07 PM »

Quote from: ironglow on July 18, 2010, 03:07:45 PM

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 01:20:00 PM
Nope. You and Casull are incorrect. It is also 14 in at least one other state. Kinda sucks to be wrong don't it?

Seeing Casull's above post (Missippi 9-3-65), we can see why you believe it sucks to be wrong...

My cousin must know his stuff from a career of working with sex offenders. What they won't do to make themselves sound like they are in the right. Sick, Sick, Sick!

wreckhog · « **Reply #67 on:** July 18, 2010, 03:51:35 PM »

Quote from: Casull on July 18, 2010, 07:56:40 AM

Quote
BS. Lowest age of consent in the US is in Mississippi. 12 is the magic number. Guess what? RED STATE!

BS!!!!!!!!!!!! Age of consent in Mississippi is 16. All states in the US set their age of consent between 16 and 18.

You realize that you just contradicted yourself with your last post. No reason to believe anything you say.

wreckhog · « **Reply #68 on:** July 18, 2010, 03:52:45 PM »

Quote from: ironglow on July 18, 2010, 03:07:45 PM

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 01:20:00 PM
Nope. You and Casull are incorrect. It is also 14 in at least one other state. Kinda sucks to be wrong don't it?

Seeing Casull's above post (Missippi 9-3-65), we can see why you believe it sucks to be wrong...

Seeing as Casull's last 2 posts contradicted each other, I don't see why you choose to believe either one.

Casull · « **Reply #69 on:** July 18, 2010, 04:05:43 PM »

Quote

Seeing as Casull's last 2 posts contradicted each other, I don't see why you choose to believe either one.

What the hell are you talking about?

Quote

House Bill 834
SECTION 2. Section 97-3-65, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

97-3-65. (1) The crime of statutory rape is committed when:

(a) Any person seventeen (17) years of age or older has sexual intercourse with a child who:

(i) Is at least fourteen (14) but under sixteen (16) years of age;

Are you obstinate, or just plain stupid?

wreckhog · « **Reply #70 on:** July 18, 2010, 04:25:52 PM »

Quote from: Casull on July 18, 2010, 04:05:43 PM

Quote
Seeing as Casull's last 2 posts contradicted each other, I don't see why you choose to believe either one.

What the hell are you talking about?

Quote
House Bill 834
SECTION 2. Section 97-3-65, Mississippi Code of 1972, is amended as follows:

97-3-65. (1) The crime of statutory rape is committed when:

(a) Any person seventeen (17) years of age or older has sexual intercourse with a child who:

(i) Is at least fourteen (14) but under sixteen (16) years of age;

Are you obstinate, or just plain stupid?

Pot calling the kettle black? 14 year old and 16 year old. Do the math. You contradicted yourself.

Casull · « **Reply #71 on:** July 18, 2010, 04:40:07 PM »

Quote

Pot calling the kettle black? 14 year old and 16 year old. Do the math. You contradicted yourself.

Do you need someone to remind you to breathe? It is illegal for someone 17 or over to have sex with someone under 16. If the child is under 14, then it is illegal for anyone to have sex with them. If a 15 year old has sex with another 15 year old, it is not illegal (which one would be prosecuted?). No contradiction there. Let me repeat, no contradiction there. Now, why don't you clam up and stop showing everyone how damn stupid you are.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #72 on:** July 18, 2010, 04:49:47 PM »

Wreckhog, where is the 12 year old BS you were spouting before? Wishful thinking for ya?

wreckhog · « **Reply #73 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:22:36 PM »

Quote from: billy_56081 on July 18, 2010, 04:49:47 PM

Wreckhog, where is the 12 year old BS you were spouting before? Wishful thinking for ya?

I already posted the link in this thread.

wreckhog · « **Reply #74 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:24:04 PM »

Quote from: Casull on July 18, 2010, 04:40:07 PM

Quote
Pot calling the kettle black? 14 year old and 16 year old. Do the math. You contradicted yourself.

Do you need someone to remind you to breathe? It is illegal for someone 17 or over to have sex with someone under 16. If the child is under 14, then it is illegal for anyone to have sex with them. If a 15 year old has sex with another 15 year old, it is not illegal (which one would be prosecuted?). No contradiction there. Let me repeat, no contradiction there. Now, why don't you clam up and stop showing everyone how damn stupid you are.

You are very insulting. Natural reaction to contradicting yourself I suppose.

billy_56081 · « **Reply #75 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:26:42 PM »

As we see no mention of the age being 12? Wishful thinking, my cousin took a read of this, he says it sounds just like the pervs in the nut hut where he works.

wreckhog · « **Reply #76 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:39:24 PM »

Look harder. It is there.

wreckhog · « **Reply #77 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:49:27 PM »

Who was President in 2004? Oh, a Republican. Hmmmm.

http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/statutory-rape-state-laws.pdf

Casull · « **Reply #78 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:50:42 PM »

Quote

You are very insulting. Natural reaction to contradicting yourself I suppose.

I give up.

Casull · « **Reply #79 on:** July 18, 2010, 05:54:56 PM »

Didn't see your last post when I posted my last. Change of mind. This is from the link in your last post.

Quote

MISSISSIPPI
A. Statutory Rape—Criminal Offenses
A child less than 14 years of age is unable to consent to sexual intercourse with a person more
than 2 years older than him or her. A child between 14 and 16 years of age is unable to consent
to sexual intercourse with a person more than 3 years older than him or her.1

ironglow · « **Reply #80 on:** July 19, 2010, 01:33:17 AM »

Quote from: wreckhog on July 18, 2010, 05:49:27 PM

Who was President in 2004? Oh, a Republican. Hmmmm.

http://www.hhs.gov/opa/pubs/statutory-rape-state-laws.pdf

Wreckhog, you've lost it ! What does the fact that a Rep was prez in 2004 have to do with the individual state statutes ? This especially since your assumptions have proven so often to be wrong. You really ought to admit your mistakes, quit now and go on to a different subject.
Of course, we realize that the Dem's hero Bill Clinton would never take advantage of a simple, bimbo kid half his age...

gypsyman · « **Reply #81 on:** July 19, 2010, 03:03:54 AM »

Repeat after me''It's all Bush's fault, it's all Bush's fault''

gypsyman

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #82 on:** July 19, 2010, 04:11:38 AM »

In Va. now they tell me if the couple is over 2 years age difference its rape in many cases .
I'm not sure why its important to insist on age of consent when it is impossible to consent when druged or drunk in most states .
This Poor excuse of a male took advantage of a young girl . He let his personal pleasure control his action with total disregard for the mental and physical well being of a child . He cannot be defended and I would guess he is paying someone to let him stay where he is . God can and will judge him ( and for those who do not believe in God , may you find him before you die ) .

beerbelly · « **Reply #83 on:** July 19, 2010, 05:47:28 AM »

I will say this Statutory Rape is mans law. Nature tell teenagers when to start having sax. When those hormones start raging they are going to have sex! No law, no regions’ teaching or anything else is going to stop them.
A lot of good kids, boys go to jail for consensual sex, while the girl walks away, to crawl into bed with the next guy that strikes her fancy. This is just not right! Put them both in jail or jail no one!
Beerbelly

wreckhog · « **Reply #84 on:** July 19, 2010, 05:53:29 AM »

Not true. A few hot female teachers have made headlines in the last 10 years for the same.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #85 on:** July 19, 2010, 06:02:31 AM »

Quote from: beerbelly on July 19, 2010, 05:47:28 AM

I will say this Statutory Rape is mans law. Nature tell teenagers when to start having sax. When those hormones start raging they are going to have sex! No law, no regions’ teaching or anything else is going to stop them.
A lot of good kids, boys go to jail for consensual sex, while the girl walks away, to crawl into bed with the next guy that strikes her fancy. This is just not right! Put them both in jail or jail no one!
Beerbelly

Maybe you were that way but many if not most learn self control . Your argument is what all who fail put forth " its what any narural man would do " In fact its not , only the ones who live like animals do. IMHO.

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #86 on:** July 19, 2010, 06:06:35 AM »

Quote from: wreckhog on July 19, 2010, 05:53:29 AM

Not true. A few hot female teachers have made headlines in the last 10 years for the same.

10 years ? I got out of high school in 74 . Went to a small school 26 or so in my senior class . I know of one marriage of a student and teacher and 3 teachers "dating" students in that school . And one such teacher in clooege .
Nothing new under the sun as they say

beerbelly · « **Reply #87 on:** July 19, 2010, 11:15:00 AM »

I would bet that if the truth were told, eight out of ten males on this board could have been in trouble with this law when they were teen aged boys!
Not that they were in trouble, but could have been.
Beerbelly

SHOOTALL · « **Reply #88 on:** July 19, 2010, 11:20:25 AM »