All my life I have heard about doubles and the feel, handling etc...that may be true for some folks, but for me it is fall out from the snobs in Britian...
I don't get the fascination with over and unders, either. All of my adult life, well meaning shooters have advised that the over and under gun is the right tool for the serious clay sports enthusiast. I'd like to get on with one, just to fit in with the big boys and be cool. The problem is that I haven't found one yet that fits and feels right and that I shoot well. The more svelte the fore-end is, the less well I am likely to get on with the gun. I don't get on well with many Italian autoloaders with slender fore-ends for that same reason.
for me nothing handles and shoots as well as a nice pump...
My first shotgun, which was gifted to me when I was 14, was a New Haven 600 ct. I still own it and with its retrofitted 24" vent rib Accu-Choke barrel and incresed LOP, I shoot it fairly well. I will never part with it. But for me, nothing shoots as well as a "nice" side by side. My definition of "nice" includes guns like my 20 gauge Fox Model B. And I have wanted a Baikal 43 ever since an outdoor writer pal of mine got the Remington-branded version on a pro deal and let me shoot it. Nothing out of the box fit me as well or felt so right. It was a gun I was predisposed to hate, but after shooting it, I fell in love with it. I determined that I wanted one back then, and patiently waited for the right deal to come along, and it finally did.
So I am not shooting side by sides to express my Anglophilic leanings. And no "gun snob," British or otherwise, is likely to be too impressed with my Savage Fox Model B. The only person besides me who is impressed with their Baikal is probably Vladamir Putin, and his is a wee bit fancier than mine. But those impress the heck out me, and I shoot them well, and I enjoy shooting them, and that is why I shoot them.
Snobbery has little to do with it.
JP