Author Topic: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional  (Read 655 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline 379 Peterbilt

  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1070
Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« on: October 15, 2010, 12:11:19 AM »
A Clark County judge says Wisconsin’s ban on carrying concealed weapons is unconstitutional. In the case, authorities charged a Sauk City man with carrying a concealed weapon, after he admitted he had a knife in his waistband. He never threatened anyone. In light of the landmark Supreme Court ruling in McDonald v. City of Chicago, attorney William Poss filed a motion to dismiss the case on constitutional grounds. Judge Jon Counsell obliged Wednesday, ruling the law is overly broad and violates both the Second and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution.

“The government has to have a compelling state interest to do so (restrict the right to carry) and they have to have the least restrictive means of doing that,” said Poss. “Public safety obviously is a state interest, but there’s all kinds of ways to do that in this regard.” In his decision, Counsell states the law forces citizens to “go unarmed (thus not able to act in self defense), violate the law or carry openly,” but notes displaying weapon’s openly isn’t a “realistic alternative.”

As of now, the decision only sets a precedent in Counsell’s court, but Poss expects the case will be appealed. “It’s ultimately going to get to either the Wisconsin Supreme Court and or the United States Supreme Court one way or another,” he predicted. The decision was disseminated around the state Wednesday, and Poss already had 50 congratulatory phone messages or e-mails from colleagues by Wednesday afternoon. “There’s a lot of interest in this obviously,” he said. “It’s not a left or right type of thing quite frankly. It’s a liberty thing.”

Clark County Assistant District Attorney Dick Lewis said he has 20 days to appeal the ruling, and no decision has been made. Wisconsin is one of only two states which completely ban carrying concealed weapons.

http://www.wrn.com/2010/10/county-judge-rules-concealed-carry-ban-unconstitutional/

Offline 1sourdough

  • Trade Count: (7)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1003
  • Gender: Male
Re: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« Reply #1 on: October 15, 2010, 02:18:39 AM »
 And also, as if we didn't know it, Walker is for CC, & Barrett against it.
NRA, Veteran

Offline 379 Peterbilt

  • Moderator
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1070
Re: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« Reply #2 on: October 15, 2010, 04:17:12 AM »
Barrett says he's not just ready to sign it off one way or the other for CC, since he doesnt want it in "shopping malls and churches". To the average clueless suburban pantywaste, that might sound like "sense" on the surface. To me, he sounds like a total DF.

Tom Barrett for
Governor
Wal-mart greeter

Offline JeffG

  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1507
  • Gender: Male
Re: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« Reply #3 on: October 16, 2010, 06:19:57 AM »
Good Lord!!  Let's get this CC program going!! There are umteen court decisions that say there is no legal ban of Law Abiding Citizens having CCW permits!  Frustrating! ???
Young guys should hang out with old guys; old guys know stuff

Offline ihookem

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 763
  • Gender: Male
Re: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« Reply #4 on: October 17, 2010, 03:41:58 AM »
379, he is a bf. The only thing he is running on is he got the S$$it kicked out of him my some punk!!!!!!!! When asked if he wished he had a gun, he answered " no, I have no need for a gun"  well then maybe he should have cracked you over the head a few more times.

Offline carbineman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (58)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1322
Re: Judge rules concealed carry ban unconstitutional
« Reply #5 on: October 18, 2010, 02:58:15 PM »
The story the media neglected to tell was that the moron Barrett could have gotten himself, his daughter, the grandmother and infant she was trying to protect, all killed if the perp would have had a gun. He was arrested in the past while possessing a firearm. While one has to admire his courage to get involved, this incident could have gone south in a hurry. The smartest thing he could have done was notify authorities of the situation. They would have arrived "armed" to handle anything that came up. Barrett is an absolute liberal moron.