TM;
I have challenged you before and I must do so again. You seem to assume yourself to be speaking authoritatively when issuing your decisions upon Christian doctrine. You have even crafted terms for the doctrine most Christians on this site apparently hold..e,g, judeo-Christian, Paulist-Christian, even "re-judacized" Christianity and zenophobic. Adding adjectives to the term Christianity is obviously a convenient try at 'deflection'.
We are well aware that "straight is the gate and narrow is the way"..but God said FEW would enter in , not just one..TM7
So let's just have the courage to "lay our cards on the table"..
Most of us do endorse a Biblical doctrine position..and we can point to various church organizations, universities and seminaries which we more or less generally agree with, such as Liberty, Bob Jones, Biola, Dallas Theological, Hyles-Anderson, Coral Ridge, Cornerstone and thousands of others.
So now TM, let us know your authoritative sources in this same way..give us names and places, so we can check your roots as we in honesty, place ours are open and available.
At the moment, you are like some of the door-to-door cults, only trying to tear down the known doctrine of orthodox Christians, while doing the old "bob, weave and rope-a-dope" when it comes to placing your beliefs in the open.
Unless you honestly place your "cards on the table" giving names, places etc.. as we have done.. we will simply have to consider your doctrine as " homemade " , at best.
Here's your chance;
Man up..answer the challenge...or wimp out !
