Gatekeeping 101....a short study

[TM7]

A short study on 'GateKeeping'...this time from Australia. Aside from the usual rudeness, notice the Gatekeeper's own listening audience doesn't even believe him......fyi.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tE3pMPObcGU


...TM7
.

[williamlayton]

TM
Is there a point to this post---other than---beating a dead horse?
Blessings

[williamlayton]

Deleted by author because I was baiting.Why don't you just delete then...we don't need to know your thought processes.
OPINION----There will be a number of folks, one day, I am afraid they will be in the majority, who will say----OOPPPPPPs---Guess I was wrong.
Speculation in the face of evidence---official and otherwise---is not evidence.
You may say I don't agree with the evidence but all you have for evidence is speculation.
Blessings

.....

Actually IMO....a perusal of the evidence, both circumstanial and hard evidence; the timeline, the personnel involved, first media reports, lack of forensic evidence, knowledge of physics and chemistry, the NIST report itself, motives and who beneifited most; and the aftermath basically negates the 'Official Governmnet Conspiracy Theory' (OGCT) as being very plausible. And I have taken a very close look at this stuff from many sides and visited the sight shortly after the event. And there are many more people possessing much expertise that think the same.


..TM7
.

[williamlayton]

I don't have deletion powers---all I have is errasure powers.
I tried diligently to get back on topic with what skills availed to me.
I think you and yours do not acknowledge the forensics that identified the passengers--and the reports of the airliner and list of people onthe plane.
Now---what you are suggesting would involve this plane, its passangers and the plane itself being flown directly overhead at the time of the missle---exactly--and then landed and destroyed eleswhere along with the passengers +++++ then puting some forensic evidence in the pentagon that would help identify these passengers.
If I were to say--that all involved in this conspiracy thought do not think thru the evidence involved--and demand to make it up as they go along--that would---possibly---be seen as baiting----but how in the world can i produce a thought that shows the errors, much less the magic of the mind, of any who would contort the evidence too such a degree or call it lies?
Blessings

[williamlayton]

Could virtually nothing mean nothing----No!
IF an object hits something it cannot penetrate to allow expenditure of energy on the other side--it must expend that energy somewhere---always from the direction it was coming from----simple physics.
Put a firecracker in a pile of sand and set it off---where is the energy released?
Look at picture/film from exploding ordnance of WWI---see the shell hit the ground--see the dirt fly up from the explosion.
Are you saying you never heard interviews of the surviving family members of the plane which struck the Pentagon?
You did not see the list?
If it is made up---then it is up to you to prove they were made up people.
Blessings

[williamlayton]

There were calls from every airliner.
I certainly have made a call from an airliner.
Aviation fuel or gasoline does not burn---the fumes do. If you have a quick enouh explosions the acutual flame is dissapated quicly---fire goes out---that is how they put out well fires. Deprive it of oxygen.
The fact that there was no char is evidence of this. Put a lot of starter on a pile of charcoal and throw a match to it---if it is enclosed enough the flame goes out after the initial explosion.
Blessings

[williamlayton]

How then, if phone calls from a plane were obviously impossible, did all of the calls come from the flight of the illfated plane in Penn. ( I believe). As I said I have made a phone call from a plane using a cell phone.
Now then---what is the importance of the way the plane exploded.
We have talked about energy finding the path of least resistance to release. If it ca't go up-down or forward it must release in the direction of least resistance---the hole it left behind it.
On of the faults concerningthe Kennedy assination was the back of his head exploding from an alleged shot from the back. This has been debuked by every forensics i know of and yet people say it can't happen----but it does and it does it every time.
Christ said it best when he told the scribes and pharicees that they have not eyes to see or ears to hear.
It is a dead issue and that ol horse has long gone to the glue factory.
Blessings

[williamlayton]

Were the funerals vice-morphed.
Are you saying no one died in PENN or the Pentagon?
Blessings

[williamlayton]

 
Blessings