Author Topic: H&R Remington quality  (Read 1070 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Buster95

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Gender: Male
H&R Remington quality
« on: February 07, 2011, 11:33:50 AM »
I haven't bought a handi rifle in the last two years, how is the quality of the actual rifles "made by Remington", good , same  or worst?

Offline zackyholdem

  • Trade Count: (9)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 188
Re: H&R Remington quality
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2011, 11:56:22 AM »
check out the Illion satisfaction poll, Quick can give you the link
When freedom shivers in the cold shadow of true peril, Its always the patriots who first hear the call. - Charlton Heston

Handi's -30-06, 223 Ultra, 7mm-08, 44 mag, 45-70, 17hmr, Tracker II 12ga, Pardner 10ga (2)12ga's and .410

Offline quickdtoo

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (149)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 43300
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Remington quality
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2011, 12:01:52 PM »
It's in the FAQs, just use ctrl f to search the page for Ilion.  ;)

Tim
"Always do right, this will gratify some and astonish the rest" -  Mark Twain

Offline Buster95

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Remington quality
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2011, 02:40:15 PM »
Most of the post in the poll concern repairs or barrels replacement but how is the fit and finish on the "Remington" Handi ? I'm interested in another BC in 45-70.

Offline flinthead

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 242
Re: H&R Remington quality
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2011, 10:31:14 AM »
Both of mine are great... with in the last year I gave in to the Handi bug and got a camo stocked .44 mag and a Ultra 25-06,,, both look good and shoot even better.
" A single shot rifle and a one eyed dog"

Offline Buster95

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 172
  • Gender: Male
Re: H&R Remington quality
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2011, 10:49:28 AM »
Thanks for the replies  ;)