HEH. Obummer wants to let the non criminal illegal criminals stay.

[powderman]

     Townhall The Tipsheet Erika Johnsen      Erika Johnsen    Obama Administration Implementing 'Case By Case' Deportation Review 8/18/2011 | Email Erika Johnsen | All Posts By Blogger     

   Back in March, I expressed some confusion over President Obama's distinction between 'criminal' and 'non-criminal' illegal aliens, seeing as how all illegal aliens are, by definition, criminal. The President proclaimed at the time that he wanted 'non-criminal' illegal aliens to stay in this country and succeed - but it's all becoming clear to me now.
 

The Obama administration said Thursday it will indefinitely delay deporting many illegal immigrants who don't have criminal records and will offer them a chance to apply for a work permit. The government will focus on sending back convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.
The policy change will mean a case-by-case review of approximately 300,000 illegal immigrants facing possible deportation in federal immigration courts, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano said.
Advocates for an immigration overhaul contend the administration has failed to live up to its promise to only deport the "worst of the worst," as President Barack Obama has said. Since Republicans have been so unreasonable as to vote against the DREAM Act and remain unsupportive of other amnesty/open borders measures until their request for a moat filled with alligators is granted (or something), President Obama continues to implement his Latino-vote-currying policies through executive fiat.

[BUGEYE]

more votes for satans party.

[owenv]

 
 A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly.

But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men.
 
He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.


~ Marcus Tullius Cicero, Roman Statesman, philosopher and orator (42 B.C)

[BUGEYE]

owenv, that describes the current administration.

[yellowtail3]

The Obama administration said Thursday it will indefinitely delay deporting many illegal immigrants who don't have criminal records and will offer them a chance to apply for a work permit. The government will focus on sending back convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.

Sounds reasonable. It'll upset a few xenophobes & bigots, and some Repub strategists.... but it sounds reasonable. Maybe that's why they're upset?

[nomosendero]

The Obama administration said Thursday it will indefinitely delay deporting many illegal immigrants who don't have criminal records and will offer them a chance to apply for a work permit. The government will focus on sending back convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.

Sounds reasonable. It'll upset a few xenophobes & bigots, and some Repub strategists.... but it sounds reasonable. Maybe that's why they're upset?

Or because ALL Illegals are actually illegal.

[yellowtail3]

What is your proposal? Deport some? All? Immediately? Any particular order of priority?

[nomosendero]

If you need help with that statement, many are frustrated because of the obvious, Illegal in the past meant illegal. I had proposals many years ago, that doesn't matter much anymore, yours or mine..

[yellowtail3]

If you need help with that statement, many are frustrated because of the obvious, Illegal in the past meant illegal. I had proposals many years ago, that doesn't matter much anymore, yours or mine..

No help needed with a statement. The question was... what is your proposal? Deport some? All? Immediately? Any particular order of priority?

[nomosendero]

The Obama administration said Thursday it will indefinitely delay deporting many illegal immigrants who don't have criminal records and will offer them a chance to apply for a work permit. The government will focus on sending back convicted criminals and those who might be a national security or public safety threat.

Sounds reasonable. It'll upset a few xenophobes & bigots, and some Repub strategists.... but it sounds reasonable. Maybe that's why they're upset?

You like to dwell on words or statements for some reason as many have pointed out. I was commenting on your last statement & only the last statement "maybe that's why they're upset". Most are upset because of the entire concept of not treating Illegals as Illegal to begin with. That has frrustrated people for a very, very long time.

[yellowtail3]

You like to dwell on words or statements for some reason as many have pointed out.

No need to get into Dee's obsession.

I was commenting on your last statement & only the last statement "maybe that's why they're upset". Most are upset because of the entire concept of not treating Illegals as Illegal to begin with. That has frrustrated people for a very, very long time.

Many are frustrated. But seriously - what do you recommend we do? Deport all illegals? Some? Any particular order? Let some stay? What would be King nomosendero's plan? (king, so as to not have to deal with some troublesome legislature)

[nomosendero]

Oh, it is not about Dee, but you!! 
 
    Quote from: Dee on August 14, 2011, 08:48:39 AM

yellowtail3, while I don't really expect to get anything, but sarcasm, I would ask you? Why do you hang on to these trivial "nit picks" such as the one (escutcheon) you are now enthralled with? I have given a perfectly plausible explanation to it's use here, as have others. You draw these arguments through your own contentiousness, and seem to revel in trying to pin someone down over something so trivial as a "word". You seem not so much about the discussion, as more about the belittlement of the person, by "nit picking him or her". You seem to be attempting to derail a discussion by challenging a poster concerning one word, that know one else questioned, nor did it in any way, detract from the discussion. What's up with that?

I've wondered that too.   
The Moderator, Dukkillr and many more
 

Yes, folks are upset & I stated why.
 
The rest is all yours, as I never implied I had the answer or was going to propose one.
 
King, wow a little anamosity there. Don't know , I can't relate to that, only a Lib thinks they know what's best for everyone Therefore, what would you do, other than troll, hmmm?