Author Topic: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts  (Read 433 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
http://www.dailypaul.com/171724/audit-of-the-federal-reserve-reveals-16-trillion-in-secret-bailouts
 
24 July, 2011
The first ever GAO(Government Accountability Office) audit of the Federal Reserve was carried out in the past few months due to the Ron Paul, Alan Grayson Amendment to the Dodd-Frank bill, which passed last year. Jim DeMint, a Republican Senator, and Bernie Sanders, an independent Senator, led the charge for a Federal Reserve audit in the Senate, but watered down the original language of the house bill(HR1207), so that a complete audit would not be carried out. Ben Bernanke, Alan Greenspan, and various other bankers vehemently opposed the audit and lied to Congress about the effects an audit would have on markets. Nevertheless, the results of the first audit in the Federal Reserve’s nearly 100 year history were posted on Senator Sander’s webpage earlier this morning.
What was revealed in the audit was startling: $16,000,000,000,000.00 had been secretly given out to US banks and corporations and foreign banks everywhere from France to Scotland. From the period between December 2007 and June 2010, the Federal Reserve had secretly bailed out many of the world’s banks, corporations, and governments. The Federal Reserve likes to refer to these secret bailouts as an all-inclusive loan program, but virtually none of the money has been returned and it was loaned out at 0% interest. Why the Federal Reserve had never been public about this or even informed the United States Congress about the $16 trillion dollar bailout is obvious — the American public would have been outraged to find out that the Federal Reserve bailed out foreign banks while Americans were struggling to find jobs.
To place $16 trillion into perspective, remember that GDP of the United States is only $14.12 trillion. The entire national debt of the United States government spanning its 200+ year history is “only” $14.5 trillion. The budget that is being debated so heavily in Congress and the Senate is “only” $3.5 trillion. Take all of the outrage and debate over the $1.5 trillion deficit into consideration, and swallow this Red pill: There was no debate about whether $16,000,000,000,000 would be given to failing banks and failing corporations around the world.
In late 2008, the TARP Bailout bill was passed and loans of $800 billion were given to failing banks and companies. That was a blatant lie considering the fact that Goldman Sachs alone received 814 billion dollars. As is turns out, the Federal Reserve donated $2.5 trillion to Citigroup, while Morgan Stanley received $2.04 trillion. The Royal Bank of Scotland and Deutsche Bank, a German bank, split about a trillion and numerous other banks received hefty chunks of the $16 trillion.
“This is a clear case of socialism for the rich and rugged, you’re-on-your-own individualism for everyone else.” – Bernie Sanders(I-VT)
When you have conservative Republican stalwarts like Jim DeMint(R-SC) and Ron Paul(R-TX) as well as self identified Democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders all fighting against the Federal Reserve, you know that it is no longer an issue of Right versus Left. When you have every single member of the Republican Party in Congress and progressive Congressmen like Dennis Kucinich sponsoring a bill to audit the Federal Reserve, you realize that the Federal Reserve is an entity onto itself, which has no oversight and no accountability.
Americans should be swelled with anger and outrage at the abysmal state of affairs when an unelected group of bankers can create money out of thin air and give it out to megabanks and supercorporations like Halloween candy. If the Federal Reserve and the bankers who control it believe that they can continue to devalue the savings of Americans and continue to destroy the US economy, they will have to face the realization that their trillion dollar printing presses can be stopped with five dollars worth of bullets.
The list of institutions that received the most money from the Federal Reserve can be found on page 131 of the GAO Audit and are as follows..
Citigroup: $2.5 trillion ($2,500,000,000,000)
Morgan Stanley: $2.04 trillion ($2,040,000,000,000)
Merrill Lynch: $1.949 trillion ($1,949,000,000,000)
Bank of America: $1.344 trillion ($1,344,000,000,000)
Barclays PLC (United Kingdom): $868 billion ($868,000,000,000)
Bear Sterns: $853 billion ($853,000,000,000)
Goldman Sachs: $814 billion ($814,000,000,000)
Royal Bank of Scotland (UK): $541 billion ($541,000,000,000)
JP Morgan Chase: $391 billion ($391,000,000,000)
Deutsche Bank (Germany): $354 billion ($354,000,000,000)
UBS (Switzerland): $287 billion ($287,000,000,000)
Credit Suisse (Switzerland): $262 billion ($262,000,000,000)
Lehman Brothers: $183 billion ($183,000,000,000)
Bank of Scotland (United Kingdom): $181 billion ($181,000,000,000)
BNP Paribas (France): $175 billion ($175,000,000,000)
and many many more including banks in Belgium of all places
View the 266-page GAO audit of the Federal Reserve(July 21st, 2011): http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf
Source: http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-11-696
FULL PDF on GAO server: http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d11696.pdf
Senator Sander’s Article: http://sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/news/?id=9e2a4ea8-6e73-4b...
 
http://www.countercurrents.org/bailout240711.htm
 
 
held fast

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
Re: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
« Reply #1 on: July 29, 2011, 11:00:00 AM »
Good grief. I reckon obummer didn't know about it, right?? POWDERMAN.  >:( >:(
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
« Reply #2 on: July 29, 2011, 11:11:12 AM »
Charlie:
 He might actually have been kept out of the circle on that one.  Need to Know etc.......
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline crustylicious

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 697
  • Reading is fundamental, comprehension optional!
Re: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
« Reply #3 on: July 29, 2011, 12:06:36 PM »
Grandoise misrepresentation of the facts:
For example:With regard to the 16 trillion on page 131 someone conveniently forgot this tidbit found on page 130
"For example, an overnight PDCF loan of $10 billion that was renewed daily at the same level for 30 business days would result in an aggregate amount borrowed of $300 billion although the institution"
As for the claim that loans are unpaid see page 154
"The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so sure of themselves, and the wiser people so full of doubts." Bertrand Russell
"The speaking in perpetual hyperbole is comely in nothing but love" Francis Bacon, Sr.
Voting is like driving a car- choose (D) to go forward- choose (R) to go backwards!
When all think alike, no one thinks very much. Albert Einstein

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
« Reply #4 on: July 29, 2011, 12:43:09 PM »
Unfortunately the DEVIL is always in the details.  However I do agree that the financial bailouts were for the "Haves and the Have Mores".  The average person who had a mortgage and was having trouble ... too bad.  I do not know of anyone including myself who was ever helped or even acknowledged with anything other than "it's in process" on getting a mortgage adjustment.  Why should they help you, they will just take the house back, sell it for a loss and then present the bill to the taxpayers who "insured" the loan since the financial community was too big to fail...

Offline teamnelson

  • Trade Count: (30)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4487
  • Gender: Male
Re: Audit Of The Federal Reserve Reveals $16 Trillion In Secret Bailouts
« Reply #5 on: July 29, 2011, 01:05:10 PM »
TM7, what drew me to this article was not so much the size of the loans or to whom they were given. Its remarkable that we were 1) even able to have an audit of the FRB, partial though it was.
And that 2) there were politicians willing to put their name on the request for an audit, from different parties even.
I would not be suprised to learn that there will be a heightened campaign to discredit Paul as an old crackpot, or a wave of mysterious tragedies kicks in.
 
Crusty, I concur that it appears as though the audit disagrees with itself in that in one spot it mentions outstanding debt, and in another, its paid off. What alarms me is that these were interest free. Why would the FED issue interest free loans using our money? What would've been the interest off of $16T, and would not that have helped stabilize our assets in some way - and I'm not really greedy. The guys at the FED can have a reasonable slice of that pie, good on them for securing so many accounts ... but dang, how stupid can you be to not make a profit on that ...
 
But this was not a full audit, was it? And it seems to be internally inconsistent doesn't it? It isn't logical to assume that the FED didn't profit somewhere in there ... I wonder if that's all over in the other set of books that they weren't allowed to review. I wonder if the FED is actually holding $16T in notes on these institutions, or at least a little protection percentage.
 
And finally, I think the author of this article has a valid point. How is it that the FED can make $16T decisions without any government involvement? That's more than our GDP, more than 1/4th of the global GDP.
 
Sorry, no interest (supposedly), paid off (uncertain), with no governmental oversight (really?). I don't buy it.
held fast