Hmmm, Quite a brain tickler there Pat :?
This could get complicated to answer and take me all night to type.
First I must say that I've never sighted in a gun for 25 yards because I can see that far without a scope. Secondly you didn't mention how much higher.
If you do this same test sighted in at say 100yds is the bullet still hitting high? Ok, maybe the 300 gr. bullet is initially slower than the 240, but at 100 yds it has lost less velocity than the lighter bullet due to greater kinetic energy. I don't have any exact figures on this but is very possible that the 300 gr will reach a 100 yd target traveling at the same velocity as the 240 gr . But I don't have a clue if it will get there at the same time.
I don't have the equipment to measure this. :cry:
But seein how my 300 gr loads hit lower at 100 yds than my 240 gr do, I can only assume that the 240 got a head start.
Now back to that 25 yd thing. Assuming that your scope's cross hairs are sitting between 1 to 2 inches above the centerline of your bore, sighting in at 25 yds is going to put quite an upward slope on your barrel to reach paralax free shooting. This in itself I know will cause a heavier bullet to shoot higher at greater ranges, but since I've never shot a scoped anything at 25 yds I can't quote on this. Shooting a bullet at anything other than right angles to the force of gravity will change the ballistics dramatically as the bullet's kenetic energy is now to some extent working either against or with the forces of gravity depending on angle out of 90 degrees from gravitational forces. Wether any of this will change the ballistics at 25 yds from a 240 to 300 gr bullet, I don't know, but it's possible.
From another view, if you consider the difference between a breaked versus non-breaked gun "which is how this string started to begin with"
fealt recoil has nothing to with accuracy on a mechanical level since the bullet has left the rifling before the diverted gasses take effect, but this same theory wouldn't be true of a ported barrel as the the recoil of the bullet moving in the barrel would be offset by the diverted gasses before the bullet left the rifling causing the barrel to jerk up and then back down before the bullet left the barrel which would cause severe problems with accuracy. Just ask Larry Kelly if his mag-na-ported barrels are less accurate than others :shock:
Fact is I don't have a high speed camera to see if a barrel raises before the bullet left it, but common sense can tell me that a 3 to 5 pound pistol will not accelerate at the same rate as a 240 to 300 gr bullet will in an atmosphere and chances are the bullet has left the barrel before you feel the recoil. OK, I've been writing and drinking for quite a while now , so if any of this doesn't make sense, it's either I've had too much scotch or you've fallin asleep reading this. Just my opinion
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75aea/75aea736e001fce787400e5ff976f15f97408410" alt="Cheesy :D"