Author Topic: newt G. vs R Paul  (Read 1018 times)

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
newt G. vs R Paul
« on: November 27, 2011, 07:13:28 AM »

Lets take a good look at Newt G. vs Ron P.

http://www.hithimagain.com/2011/11/13/newt-gingrichs-voting-record-cant-compare-to-ron-pauls/

One would think most on this forum would gladly vote for RP after comparing the two..... but  ::)
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline Matt

  • .:{º.º}:.
  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2119
  • Gender: Male
    • Inkredible Image
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2011, 12:06:47 PM »
Any fool can know. The point is to understand.”
― Albert Einstein

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2011, 12:25:33 PM »
 ;) I like it!

Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline yellowtail3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5664
  • Gender: Male
  • Oh father of the four winds, fill my sails!
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #3 on: November 28, 2011, 04:41:41 AM »
Here's a summary of Gingrich's family life: blah blah blah

Doesn't look good. Anyhow... I'm still favoring Ron Paul.
Jesus said we should treat other as we'd want to be treated... and he didn't qualify that by their party affiliation, race, or even if they're of diff religion.

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #4 on: November 28, 2011, 02:30:29 PM »
Sounds like Newt has a lot in common with John "four hundred dollar hairdo" Edwards.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline powderman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 32823
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2011, 04:46:14 PM »
Newts past immorality will gain him dem votes, thats what they look up to and admire. POWDERMAN.  :o :o
Mr. Charles Glenn “Charlie” Nelson, age 73, of Payneville, KY passed away Thursday, October 14, 2021 at his residence. RIP Charlie, we'll will all miss you. GB

Only half the people leave an abortion clinic alive.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MAiOEV0v2RM
What part of ILLEGAL is so hard to understand???
I learned everything about islam I need to know on 9-11-01.
http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TDqmy1cSqgo
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_u9kieqGppE&feature=related
http://www.illinois.gov/gov/contactthegovernor.cfm

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6644
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #6 on: November 29, 2011, 04:26:51 AM »
I don't really care what a person does in his personal affairs if he believes in freedom, the Constitution and free enterprise and can get this country back on track.  Apparently Obama is quite the family guy, but that hasn't helped one iota to put this country back on line. 
 
Now, having said that, I am not prepared to get on Gingrich's bandwagon--yet.  But if it comes down to Newt against Barry, we'd all better hope that people can overlook a less than sparkling matrimonial history.
Swingem

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #7 on: November 29, 2011, 04:33:59 AM »
charcter flaws are just that flaws in ones charcter and point out that someones charcter is not solid .
We have accepted this as the lessor of two evils and where has it gotten us ? J.E. Hoover made a carrer out of exploiting peoples charcter flaws. So now we are to vote for more of the same ?
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #8 on: November 29, 2011, 03:24:52 PM »
Newt vs. Barry = 3rd party vote for me. I'm all set with voting for "gun control" Gingrich. I could care less about Newt's personal life but his voting record is bad enough that I'll never vote for him at any cost.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline Draxx

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 44
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2011, 04:04:49 PM »
Quote
[/Newt vs. Barry = 3rd party vote for mequote] Enjoy Barry's 2nd term then. I understand voting strictly on principle, that is what primaries are for. When the majority of the party members vote and decide the candidate is somebody you don't find appealing, you plug your nose and vote the party candidate.

 I admit, conservatives have had to do this repeatedly i.e Jon McCain, G. Bush. But the other option is go with the Ross Perot third party guy who is unelectable and hand the opposition the race. That is reality.

 Many love Ron Paul. Fantastic. I am not a huge fan and the reality is he won't win the primary most likely. His supporters fought the good fight and lost. It happens.

 Staying home or voting for some third party guy that won't win is foolish in my opinion. Getting the senate and house firmly won and stoked with more Rand Paul types is most important anyway. They write the laws, not a Newt  or Mitt president.

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2011, 04:59:32 PM »
The lesser of two evils mentality is what has us on this runaway big government train. To me that is much more foolish than voting on principle. I'd rather be part of the solution than the problem. Otherwise we will have a perpetual string of Jorge Bush, Juan McAmnesty, Mitt Obamney, Newt Guncontolrich type liberal candidates. If you're willing to vote for them then all the power to ya. I myself prefer to vote for candidates that have a voting record and principles that I actually agree with. The mainstream Republican candidates are way too fiscally liberal socialists, I refuse to vote for someone just because they have an "R" next to their name.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline Lost Farmboy

  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1078
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2011, 11:32:25 PM »
  Well said Doublebass. Voting for the lessor of two evils is not only throwing your vote away, it is participating in evil.
A nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.   John F. Kennedy

"If we ever forget that we're one nation under God, then we will be a nation gone under" -Ronald Reagan

“So this is how liberty dies; with thunderous applause.”  Padme Amidala

Offline Singleshotsam

  • I.T. Professional
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2011, 11:38:31 PM »
My goodness what a refreshing thread to read this morning.  To think there are members on here that will look at candidates voting record before making a decision... I need to travel and shake a few hands and buy you guys a cup of coffee.
 
 
Quote
The lesser of two evils mentality is what has us on this runaway big government train. To me that is much more foolish than voting on principle. I'd rather be part of the solution than the problem. Otherwise we will have a perpetual string of Jorge Bush, Juan McAmnesty, Mitt Obamney, Newt Guncontolrich type liberal candidates. If you're willing to vote for them then all the power to ya. I myself prefer to vote for candidates that have a voting record and principles that I actually agree with. The mainstream Republican candidates are way too fiscally liberal socialists, I refuse to vote for someone just because they have an "R" next to their name.
   And more common sense!  I must be in a dream.  All I've been hearing from people lately is how a vote 3rd party is a vote for Obama.  Well I bought into that mentality last election when I voted for John McCain and that was still a vote for Obama.  The two party system lie is how we've found ourselves in the mess were in.  A vote for Romney or Gingrich is still a vote for Obama.  They're all of the same cloth.   As far is R.P. is concerned, how can you not like a guy that has a sign on his desk that reads "Don't steal.  The Government hates competition."     
I'm voting 3rd party in this election by writing in Jesus Christ for president.  Sadly even if this were an option most of you would still vote Republican because "It's a two party system."

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #13 on: November 30, 2011, 08:33:05 AM »
..............................
............................................
 
 
Quote
...................
.......................................  Well I bought into that mentality last election when I voted for John McCain and that was still a vote for Obama.....................
...................................................................     

 If you had voted for a 3rd candidate, this would have changed to outcome how??
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline blind ear

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4156
  • Gender: Male
    • eddiegjr
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #14 on: November 30, 2011, 08:42:51 AM »
..............................
............................................
 
 
Quote
...................
.......................................  Well I bought into that mentality last election when I voted for John McCain and that was still a vote for Obama.....................
...................................................................     

 If you had voted for a 3rd candidate, this would have changed to outcome how??

He will vote his concience and feel better about himself. ear
Oath Keepers: start local
-
“It is no coincidence that the century of total war coincided with the century of central banking.” – Ron Paul, End the Fed
-
An economic crash like the one of the 1920s is the only thing that will get the US off of the road to Socialism that we are on and give our children a chance at a future with freedom and possibility of economic success.
-
everyone hears but very few see. (I can't see either, I'm not on the corporate board making rules that sound exactly the opposite of what they mean, plus loopholes) ear
"I have seen the enemy and I think it's us." POGO
St Judes Childrens Research Hospital

Offline Singleshotsam

  • I.T. Professional
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2011, 12:30:29 PM »
..............................
............................................
 
 
Quote
...................
.......................................  Well I bought into that mentality last election when I voted for John McCain and that was still a vote for Obama.....................
...................................................................     

 If you had voted for a 3rd candidate, this would have changed to outcome how??

He will vote his concience and feel better about himself. ear

Essentially yes.  If I find that a 3rd party candidate's voting record and views are what I decide is best for this country then my responsibility as a US citizen is to vote for who I believe will do the best job.  In the case of our outlooks for the 2012 election, if Romney or Gingrich win the GOP nomination then a vote for either one of them is vote for liberalism.  Obama, Romney, Gingrich... All cut from the same cloth. 
I'm voting 3rd party in this election by writing in Jesus Christ for president.  Sadly even if this were an option most of you would still vote Republican because "It's a two party system."

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2011, 05:10:40 PM »
Good posts guys. We are in a long rut of voting in either very liberal Republicans or Socialist Democrats. We are so afraid of the Socialists that we're willing to settle on voting for the slightly less liberal Republican just to keep the Socialist out. This type of thinking will never create change. Change can only come from us, the ranks of the working class. We are still the majority (for now) so it's up to us whether we want to continue on this same destructive path or if we at least want to put a dent in what's going on.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #17 on: December 01, 2011, 03:44:54 AM »
All well and good IF you can get a large amount of voters to support a 3rd Party or Independent candidate. I don't even see this possibility approaching our planet.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline Singleshotsam

  • I.T. Professional
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #18 on: December 01, 2011, 04:28:13 AM »
Quote
All well and good IF you can get a large amount of voters to support a 3rd Party or Independent candidate. I don't even see this possibility approaching our planet.

I think it should be remembered that RP is running on the Republican ticket atm... And doing quite well.
I'm voting 3rd party in this election by writing in Jesus Christ for president.  Sadly even if this were an option most of you would still vote Republican because "It's a two party system."

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5201
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #19 on: December 01, 2011, 05:37:00 AM »
Quote
All well and good IF you can get a large amount of voters to support a 3rd Party or Independent candidate. I don't even see this possibility approaching our planet.

I think it should be remembered that RP is running on the Republican ticket atm... And doing quite well.



Right you are! Yet so many of our Republican brothers see him as a old kook,that's out to destroy the Republican party. Nothing could be further from the truth!He represents all the values the (OLD) GOP not only believe in, but tried to practice.

OH! The power of the media ::)
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline Singleshotsam

  • I.T. Professional
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (5)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1682
  • Gender: Male
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #20 on: December 01, 2011, 06:39:42 AM »
Quote
Yet so many of our Republican brothers see him as a old kook,that's out to destroy the Republican party.

Well put.  Our current batch of Republicans see Ron Paul as a threat to their power.  Advocating smaller government and large cuts in spending has Republicans in fear of loosing the power they have over the people...

*p.s.*  I should say that his plans have Politicians on both sides of the aisle in fear of losing power over the masses.
I'm voting 3rd party in this election by writing in Jesus Christ for president.  Sadly even if this were an option most of you would still vote Republican because "It's a two party system."

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #21 on: December 01, 2011, 08:03:47 AM »
All well and good IF you can get a large amount of voters to support a 3rd Party or Independent candidate. I don't even see this possibility approaching our planet.

If you don't believe it's a possibility then settle for whoever you think can beat Barry and vote the lesser of two evils, it's your right to do so. Just don't blame me if Barry gets re-elected because I chose to vote for the candidate that I actually agree with, it's my right to do so. I don't automatically vote for the "R", candidates have to earn my vote.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783

Offline rio grande

  • Trade Count: (39)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1205
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #22 on: December 01, 2011, 02:23:24 PM »
This IS a good thread. Many level-headed and moral people here.
I like Paul.
 But if Paul was not in the race at all I'd still say this - there is no way the grinch could beat Obama.  Gingrich impresses too many people as a mean-spirited, hypocritical, pompous ass.
 

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #23 on: December 02, 2011, 09:33:02 AM »
 It doesn't appear to be sensible that if your candidate isn't selected in the Primary  not to vote at all in the General. None of the GOP's are as bad as the present charade in the WH.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline Doublebass73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (46)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4579
Re: newt G. vs R Paul
« Reply #24 on: December 02, 2011, 01:17:40 PM »
It doesn't appear to be sensible that if your candidate isn't selected in the Primary  not to vote at all in the General. None of the GOP's are as bad as the present charade in the WH.

I'd still vote in the general if there was a 3rd party candidate that I liked. I refuse to vote for Mitt Obamney or Newt Guncontrolrich, they are both big government liberals that I can't stand. To me there is nothing sensible about voting for candidates that I don't at least somewhat agree with.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."

---- William Pitt (the Younger), Speech in the House of Commons, November 18, 1783