Author Topic: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?  (Read 1207 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Redie Fredie

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
  • Fred "G" Sanford
Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« on: November 03, 2011, 02:38:10 PM »
I just picked up a Ruger Bisley Blackhawk (Blue) in .41 Rem Mag, It has a 6" (or 5.5") barrel; I had never seen any in this length before, though now they have 'em in Stainless, is this an unusual model?  ???
"the G Stands for Guns"

Offline tacklebury

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
  • Gender: Male
  • Central Michigan
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #1 on: November 03, 2011, 03:07:18 PM »
5.5" is a common blackhawk length.  Mine's a NMB Convertible .45 LC / .45 ACP model.  ;)  I like the 5.5" as a good in between still carryable, but little better balance then the long barrels.  Just personal opinion mainly.  ;)
Tacklebury --}>>>>>    Multi-Barrel: .223 Superlite, 7mm-08 22", .30-40 Krag M158, .357 Maximum 16-1/4 HB, .45 Colt, .45-70 22" irons, 32" .45-70 Peeps, 12 Ga. 3-1/2 w/ Chokes, .410 Smooth slugger, .45 Cal Muzzy, .50 Cal Muzzy, .58 Cal Muzzy

also classics: M903 9-shot Target .22 Revolver, 1926 .410 Single, 1915 38 S&W Break top Revolver and 7-shot H&R Trapper .22 6" bbl.


Offline Redie Fredie

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
  • Fred "G" Sanford
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #2 on: November 04, 2011, 02:33:58 PM »
tacklebury
On your Ruger; What is the length from the tip of the barrel to the back of the forcing cone?
Think mine is 6" but..
"the G Stands for Guns"

Offline tacklebury

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
  • Gender: Male
  • Central Michigan
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #3 on: November 04, 2011, 03:19:56 PM »
Mine's 5 & 7/16"  ;)
Tacklebury --}>>>>>    Multi-Barrel: .223 Superlite, 7mm-08 22", .30-40 Krag M158, .357 Maximum 16-1/4 HB, .45 Colt, .45-70 22" irons, 32" .45-70 Peeps, 12 Ga. 3-1/2 w/ Chokes, .410 Smooth slugger, .45 Cal Muzzy, .50 Cal Muzzy, .58 Cal Muzzy

also classics: M903 9-shot Target .22 Revolver, 1926 .410 Single, 1915 38 S&W Break top Revolver and 7-shot H&R Trapper .22 6" bbl.


Offline Redie Fredie

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
  • Fred "G" Sanford
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2011, 01:54:58 PM »
Mine measures out to 6" and since yours is 5.5ish to the forcing cone and yours is a 5.5" model, mine must be a true six inch model.
Thanks
hope to shoot it soon
hoping to get a holster before hunting season also.
"the G Stands for Guns"

Offline tacklebury

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (12)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3633
  • Gender: Male
  • Central Michigan
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2011, 02:24:32 PM »
I made my own out of an old boot.  ;)
Tacklebury --}>>>>>    Multi-Barrel: .223 Superlite, 7mm-08 22", .30-40 Krag M158, .357 Maximum 16-1/4 HB, .45 Colt, .45-70 22" irons, 32" .45-70 Peeps, 12 Ga. 3-1/2 w/ Chokes, .410 Smooth slugger, .45 Cal Muzzy, .50 Cal Muzzy, .58 Cal Muzzy

also classics: M903 9-shot Target .22 Revolver, 1926 .410 Single, 1915 38 S&W Break top Revolver and 7-shot H&R Trapper .22 6" bbl.


Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #6 on: November 07, 2011, 12:42:37 PM »
  Ahhh, folks, notice the OP stated this one he's inquiring about is 1) a blued Bisley and 2) a .41 magnum and has a 5 1/2" or 6" barrel!     Then all that was asked is if was an unusual model.    So...     
  For starters there's not been a blued Bisley in .41 magnum made available from Ruger.   Secondly, the .41 magnum has not been available in a 5 1/2" barrel configuration other than the stainless Bisleys produced for Acusport and then later, Williams'.     Couple those two together and it's pretty certain this is simply something someone had done, or did it themselves.  Pretty easy to do.    Gonna take a guess that it was either a Bisley someone cut the barrel down on.  (can tell from the barrel rollmarks) or a standard BH that someone cut down and Bisley-ized.
  Regardless, great chambering in a great configuration. :)



"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline BigMuddy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 126
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #7 on: November 07, 2011, 02:59:59 PM »
"For starters there's not been a blued Bisley in .41 magnum made available from Ruger."

Not in that barrel length anyway. They did make blued Bisley 41's in 7.5". As stated this one has been cut or "put together"

Dan
"Remember the Code"

Offline BlkHawk73

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1501
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #8 on: November 08, 2011, 10:44:44 AM »
"For starters there's not been a blued Bisley in .41 magnum made available from Ruger."

Not in that barrel length anyway. They did make blued Bisley 41's in 7.5". As stated this one has been cut or "put together"

Dan




 Yes, sorry.  I knew that too - Have a pair of them. Brain glitch.  Thank you for the correction. :)
"Never Surrender, Just Carry On."  - G.S.

Offline Redie Fredie

  • Trade Count: (16)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 129
  • Fred "G" Sanford
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #9 on: November 08, 2011, 11:28:30 AM »
sent a letter to Ruger for info.
Starting to come to the conclusion that it had been cut, the front blade is not as I remember from my 44 Bisley.
If it shoots I'll be happy.
"the G Stands for Guns"

Offline wallacem

  • Trade Count: (36)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 401
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #10 on: December 07, 2011, 10:31:32 AM »
I bought a Bisley 41 mag the first year production, 7.5" blue.  I took it straight to my gunsmith, who chopped the bbl to 5.5".  It is home to stay.  Wallacem in Ga

Offline Dand

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (35)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2974
Re: Ruger Bisley .41RM in 5.5 or 6"?
« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2011, 11:43:08 PM »
I too bought the first 41 mag bisley I sawn -- in Kodiak.  I kept the 7.5 in barrel but I'm not crazy about it.  Awfully long for carrying. It mostly goes to the range now.  I did carry quite a bit before I got my stainless redhawk and even later my 57 Mt Gun.  But I pitted the Bisley bore when I was in really wet country and had to keep the gun real discrete.  Had a new 7.5 put on.  Darn, I wish I'd thought to have a shorter one made then.  But I was trying caribou hunting with it then and wanted the added velocity of the long barrel. 


Let us know how the shorter barrel works out - original or not - if it handles well it might be a really nice rig.


One day when I stumble on a 4 5/8 black hawk I'll probably bring it home - love the look and have never fired the black hawk version.


Sure like how the bisley fits my hand and handles recoil.


POST a photo - I'd lie to see how it looks.
NRA Life

liberal Justice Hugo Black said, and I quote: "There are 'absolutes' in our Bill of Rights, and they were put there on purpose by men who knew what words meant and meant their prohibitions to be 'absolutes.'" End quote. From a recent article by Wayne LaPierre NRA