I have a CZ 452 in .22 RF that I use with the excellent open sights, adjust the rear to 200 yards and from a bench it puts .22 LR into the paper at that distance. Tried my Ruger 10/22 yesterday at 200 and 300 yards. This Ruger is their fancy factory model with the bull barrel and laminated stock, attention done to the bolt and trigger over the cheaper model. I was using 40 grain Eley target ammo.
As the Ruger has a 3 X 9 Nikon scope on it I could see the bullet impacts, it suffered badly at 300 yards, tried aiming high and it just did not hit the paper, could see it hitting the ground way before the target when aiming right at the paper. A little better results at 200, but still, a substantial drop at that distance as well. Seemed like a waste of time to try to hit the paper at 200 yards.
I know that the CZ uses a very good barrel, and longer too over the Ruger. I figured with the Ruger having the more expensive barrel for its type it would do better. At the closer ranges designed for .22 RF the Ruger shoots fine. Would I be better off putting an after market barrel on the Ruger, or is it the nature of the semi-auto design to not perform at 200 yards over a bolt gun? How about sticking to light bullets loaded to high velocity over the 40 grain target mediums?
There are some guys on You Tube who shoot .22 RF rifles at 200 yards, so I am not the only one who likes the challenge.
Thanks.