I don't think so. The liability would be too great.
My wife shoots a Marlin .44 Mag Carbine. Several years ago she loaded up some shells using the LYMAN manual. These loads were specifically for the .44 Carbine, and had a warning that they were too potent for the Pistol. She stored them in a Ziplock that was well marked. They shot well in her carbine, and she was happy that they seemed to have a bit more authority than the loads I had always loaded for her. Over the years, and a move to DC then back to Alaska. While in DC we made a few trips to Tennessee to hunt Deer, and hauled them in a bag to and from. Eventually the markings and warnings wore off.
A couple of years after returning to Alaska I was going to the range. I grabbed my Ruger Super Blackhawk. There was this bag of .44 shells in the vault, so I picked them up, forgetting about how hot they were loaded. I went to the range, and the recoil of the first shot told me something was wrong. I looked at the gun and noticed the top strap of the frame was bent upwards. The cylinder would not turn, and I could see a crack along the sides of that chamber. Could not remove the cylinder to unload the gun. I realized I had been lucky I had not been hurt.