- The “no tanks at Fallujah” comment is on the video you originally posted, at about 3:55. He’s certainly wrong on that, the video record with embedded reporters shows plenty of armor in use.
- The Javelin missile clip is also incorrect, that clip is several years old and nobody until now has proposed that it’s a secret enhanced uranium warhead. The total destruction of the tank is perfectly in line with what happens when combat loaded Russian T-72 and T-80 tanks are struck, even with projectiles that have no explosives at all, such as kinetic penetrator tank rounds.
- His description of the secret weapon he proposes, also around 3:55 on your clip, is a jumbled mess that doesn’t really make any sense. He says it uses enhanced uranium combined with high explosives for a directed charge for use as an anti-personnel weapon, and then he says its “kind of a neutron bomb” with a passing reference to cold fusion, then he says its use is for genetic attack against the civilians there.
- I don’t see any rationale for the use of some super-secret uranium thermobaric weapon in Fallujah for combat purposes, the military already has conventional thermobaric weapons capable of inflicting much more damage than the US was willing to cause in Fallujah, so using a lessor secret weapon that duplicates existing conventional capabilities doesn’t make any sense. That just leaves his genetic attack theory, and why does that even need to be tied to a weapon system or the battle of Fallujah? If someone wanted to spread enhanced uranium around all they’d have to do is hire some Iraqi from outside of the city to drive around in his car and dump it all over the place, you’d hardly need some secret weapon to accomplish that.
- The bottom line is he might be exactly correct on what he claims to have found in Fallujah and with the civilians there, but he damages his credibility right out the gate with some of his statements and proposals.
