Author Topic: looks like this new tax is true?????  (Read 372 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline fatercat

  • Trade Count: (14)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 690
looks like this new tax is true?????
« on: February 14, 2012, 10:59:48 AM »

   
             
           ON JANUARY 1, 2012, THE US GOVERNMENT IS REQUIRING EVERYONE TO HAVE DIRECT DEPOSIT FOR SS CHECKS.

WONDER WHY?

Subject: HR 4646

Be sure to read entire explanation

Watch for this AFTER November elections; remember this BEFORE you VOTE, in case you think Obama is looking out for your best interest.

A 1% tax on all bank transactions is what HR 4646 calls for.

Do you receive a paycheck, or a retirement check from Social Security or a pension fund and have it direct deposit??

Well guess what ... It looks as if Obama wants to tax it 1% !!!

This bill was put forth by Rep. Chaka Fattah (D-PA).

YES, that is 1% tax on all bank transactions - HR 4646, every time it goes in and every time money goes out.

Ask your congress person to vote NO.

FORWARD THIS TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW!

1% tax on all bank transactions ~ HR 4646 - ANOTHER NEW OBAMA TAX SLIPPED IN WHILE WE WERE ASLEEP. Checked this on snopes, it's true! Check it out yourself ~ HR 4646.

President Obama's finance team is recommending a one percent (1%) transaction fee (TAX). Obama's plan is to sneak it in after the November elections to keep it under the radar.

This is a 1% tax on all transactions at any financial institution - banks, credit unions, savings and loans, etc. Any deposit you make, or even a transfer within your own bank from one account to another, will have a 1% tax charged.

If your paycheck or your Social Security or whatever is direct deposit, it will get a 1% tax charged for the transaction.

If your paycheck is $1000, then you will pay Obama $10 just for the privilege of depositing your paycheck in your bank. Even if you hand carry your paycheck or any check in to your bank for a deposit, 1% tax will be charged.

You receive a $5,000 stock dividend from your broker, Obama takes $50 just to allow you to deposit that check in the bank.

If you take $1,000 cash to deposit at your bank, 1% tax will be charged.

Mind you, this is from the man who promised that, if you make under $250,000 per year, you will not see one penny of new tax.

Keep your eyes and ears open, you will be amazed at what you learn about this guy's under-the-table moves to increase the number of ways you are taxed.

Oh, and by the way, if you receive a refund from the IRS next year and you have it direct deposited or you walk in to deposit that check, you guessed it. You will pay a 1% charge of that money just for putting it in your bank.

Remember, any money, cash, check or whatever, no matter where it came from, you will pay a 1% fee if you put it in the bank.

Some will say, oh well, it's just 1%. Are you kidding me? It's a 1% tax increase across the board. Remember, once the tax is there, they can also raise it at will. And if anyone protests, they will just say, "Oh, that's not really a tax, it's a user fee"!
g
Think this is no big deal? Go back and look at the transactions you made from last year's banking statements. Then add the total of all those transactions and deduct 1%. Still think it's no big deal?
  Click here: snopes.com: Debt Free America Act   [/t]
   
 
[/t][/t] 
 
 

I am using the Free version of SPAMfighter.
SPAMfighter has removed 1032 of my spam emails to date.

Do you have a slow PC? Try free scan!

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2012, 11:09:52 AM »
Didn't happen

http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-4646

111th Congress: 2009-2010
To establish a fee on transactions which would eliminate the national debt and replace the income tax on individuals.Sponsor: Rep. Chaka Fattah [D-PA2]This bill never became law. This bill was proposed in a previous session of Congress.  Sessions of Congress last two years, and at the end of each session all proposed bills and resolutions that haven't passed are cleared from the books. Members often reintroduce bills that did not come up for debate under a new number in the next session.
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline DDZ

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6055
  • Gender: Male
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2012, 11:15:17 AM »
Those people who will not be governed by God will be ruled by tyrants.    Wm. Penn

Offline Conan The Librarian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • McDonalds. Blecch!
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2012, 11:21:26 AM »
It's not true.
 
Also, if it had happened, then each dollar would actually be taxed at least approximately twice that rate. For example, this simple and common scenario for a responsible person:
1) Transaction from your employer to your checking account
2) Transaction from your checking account to your savings account
 
Very simple, both transactions affect you personally. Each transaction is taxed at 1%. 1% of the original amount, then 1% of the 99% that was left.
 
Expect rioting in the streets when something like that occurs.
 
 
Here's another simple and normal scenario. Five taxable events:
1) From your employer to your checking account
2) From your checking account to your savings account
3) From your savings account back to your checking account so you can have some cash on hand for debit card purchases and ATM withdrawals during a vacation
4) Back to your savings account because you didn't use it all
5) From savings back to your checking account so you can write a check to the IRS to pay your taxes.
 
Then there's this scenario:
1) From the IRS to your checking account as a tax rebate

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2012, 11:42:54 AM »
Quote
Here's another simple and normal scenario. Five taxable events:
1) From your employer to your checking account
2) From your checking account to your savings account
3) From your savings account back to your checking account so you can have some cash on hand for debit card purchases and ATM withdrawals during a vacation
4) Back to your savings account because you didn't use it all
5) From savings back to your checking account so you can write a check to the IRS to pay your taxes.


And think it out a little further.........each check or debit transaction becomes a "bank transaction" and subject to the tax..........
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline 351 power

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 794
  • Gender: Male
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2012, 02:06:25 PM »
sounds like what alex jones and max whatshisname was talking about today
every day is a gift. use it well

colour is a symbol of where you are from and not of who you are

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6626
Re: looks like this new tax is true?????
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2012, 03:01:00 AM »
The fact that this kind of crap was ever proposed by anyone is scary and should at the very least be enough to tar and feather the idiot congress critter who wrote it and the president who probably requested it.
Swingem