19th Century Racial Integration

[lgm270]

Forced racial integration in the pre-Civil War South was called  Slavery.

[yellowtail3]

Forced racial integration in the pre-Civil War South was called  Slavery.

Got a source for the assertion, or did you just... pull it out?


Who was doing the forcing?

[lgm270]

Slavery is a violation of the right of freedom of association, just like civil rights laws.

Yes, the white slaveowners in the slave era were the ones doing the forcing.  It's now the destiny of white people to have to deal with the problems that were caused by this forcing people from another world into association with white slave owners here.

Civil rights laws are just slavery and servitude by another name, designed to punish and indenture a different group.   The purpose of civil rights laws is to relegate whites to second class citizenship by destroying the rights of white people to freedom of association and freedom of contract.   Blacks, browns, queers, transsexuals and any number of other undesirables  can force  unwilling  white people to enter into contracts with them, in complete violation of traditional rights.  The relegation of  whites to second class citizenship is the new slavery.  Only they call it "civil rights".
and "anti-discrimination."

Discrimination is an important biological and social defense mechanism whereby healthy, normal life forms protect themselves from harmful associations with the dysfunctional, the inferior and the misbegotten.   You protect your family by keeping them away from scum.  You protect your children by having them in schools where they won't be shot by some gangbanger or drug dealer. 

The so called civil rights laws destroyed the right of white people to protect themselves and their families from lower forms of life.

Blacks and other feral minorities openly proclaim their hatred of white people, and then do everything they can to pursue white people.  You'd think they would avoid people whom they hate so much and always call "racists." 

White people, due to the suffocating confines of political correctness and the threats of losing their jobs, are forced to pretend to love these "people" , notwithstanding that whites do everything possible to avoid associating with them either in their neighborhoods or schools.  Minorities have their own countries, but run away from them as fast as they can to come to white America for a "better life", courtesy of dirty rotten white people.

[yellowtail3]

It's now the destiny of white people to have to deal with the problems that were caused by this forcing people from another world into association with white slave owners here.

That's a mild characterization of slavery. 19th Century Racial Integration wasn't integration, IMHO... it was slavery. They're about as alike as rape and romantic love.

Civil rights laws are just slavery and servitude by another name, designed to punish and indenture a different group.

I thought that civil rights laws were meant to ensure that no citizens would have their rights as citizens denied, in violation of the constitution.

The purpose of civil rights laws is to relegate whites to second class citizenship by destroying the rights of white people to freedom of association and freedom of contract.

New information - I did not know that!

Blacks, browns, queers, transsexuals and any number of other undesirables  can force  unwilling  white people to enter into contracts with them, in complete violation of traditional rights.  The relegation of  whites to second class citizenship is the new slavery.

I didn't know that, either!

Discrimination is an important biological and social defense mechanism whereby healthy, normal life forms protect themselves from harmful associations with the dysfunctional, the inferior and the misbegotten.

Are these the black & brown people referred to above?

Blacks and other feral minorities openly proclaim their hatred of white people, and then do everything they can to pursue white people.

What does feral mean, here? Are there non-feral minorities? How do you tell the diff?

[lgm270]

Feral means  untamed or savage.  As in "feral" dogs and "feral" hogs  that run in packs and attack and kill in packs.  If  you don't understand how this relates to "Minorities", the google "flash mobs." 

Your post reveals a pathetic ignorance of the constitution and the principles of freedom even though your admitted lack of knowledge on these issues is itself commendable.

The civil rights laws, like slavery, are  violations of the right of freedom of association.  Slavery was an infringement of the rights of freedom of association by legally superior people, slave owners,  who used their legally superior positions to violate the rights of freedom of association of legally subordinate people, i.e. slaves, by forcing them into involuntary relationships called "slavery."   

Civil rights laws are violations of the rights of freedom of association of white people, whereby legally empowered Negros, Mexicans, queers, trannsexuals, and other forms of undesirables can force unwilling, legally subordinate white people into involuntary associations.   Any of these undesirables can walk into a white person's business and force that white person  into an involunatary economic relationship, i.e. to do business with them. This  is complete violation of the right of freedom of association and the traditional right of freedom of contract.  This aberration of a law has relgated whites to  second class citizenship by stripping whites of their rights  to refuse to enter into associations or contracts with people  in violation of the white  rights of  freedom of association and freedom of contract.     

Civil rights basically turn the tables and reverse the relationship that existed between blacks and whites under slavery.

I propose the following constitutional amendment that would restore the rights of freedom of contract and association to white people and would restore  first class citizenship to white people:

The right of freedom of association, however, by whomever and on whatever basis exercised,  whether individually or otherwise, whether in commerce or otherwise,  is absolute and shall not be regulated or infringed.

This will make the right of freedom of association an express rather than an implied right and will make it an  absolute rather than a qualified right.   The clauses about whether individually exercised and whether or not in commerce will assure that  it will apply just as equally to individuals acting  jointly in organizations (corporations, etc) as to individuals acting alone, and that the Government cannot regulate the freedom of association under the Commerce Clause that has been the basis of so much government violation of peoples' rights.

This single sentence would blow away all of the civil rights laws and restore 1st class citizeneship to white people by giving them equal rights  to refuse to be dragged against their will into associations and contracts with undesirables, whether feral or non-feral.

[BAGTIC]

Very often when one hears someone ranting about how their problems are all caused by someone else it is by someone who is a failure and loser at life who is looking for a scapegoat to blame for his problems instead of looking into the bathroom mirror.

[lgm270]

Very often when one hears someone ranting about how their problems are all caused by someone else it is by someone who is a failure and loser at life who is looking for a scapegoat to blame for his problems instead of looking into the bathroom mirror.

What does this  remark have to do with this thread....the premise of which is that slavery and civil rights laws share the same premise,namely,  the violation of the right of freedom of association and freedom of contract.
Do you dispute  the fact that the purpose of slavery  was to deny blacks  the right to refuse to be involved with whites?  Do you dispute that the intention of civil rights laws  is to deny whites the right to refuse to be involved with blacks?