Honestly, what's the difference between having a hunting permit where you can use a pistol over having a pistol permit to protect one's self? I don't understand. One BIG thing to bring up is that the 2nd Amendment protects AND ALLOWS the right to bear arms(doesn't mention anything between rifles, cannons, pistols, machine guns, shotguns or otherwise anything that hurls a piece of lead/steel out the barrel with the use of a propellant. Where the difference of owning such a weapon of these kinds, is separated by the ATF and Federal/State government with the kind of license/permit you have or can get. A black powder pistol/rifle/cannon falls under a different class of weapon, which again has different rules according to Federal/State guidelines of ownership and useage. A County CAN NOT dictate what kind of weapon you can use(only State/Federal)--even if it's for hunting. This is an INFRINGEMENT UPON YOUR RIGHTS as an American Citizen according to the 2nd Amendment, and what they're doing is "reading their wants/thoughts/wishes into a historical document that was written by our "Fore Fathers", that made sure the PEOPLE have the power and not some individual or local governing body to dictate their own private ideas upon the people. The 2nd Amendment has been won by everybody who's gone to court over the issue. You may need to also write to NRA or another gun protection group to have them look into this, and they(you) may in turn need to write to the Judge's/Lawyer's Board as you're being discriminated against with the 2nd Amendment. County Judge's don't/can't make rules about a Federal Law, let alone an Amendment. This is an abuse of power.
Del