Author Topic: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview  (Read 803 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« on: June 16, 2012, 03:06:13 AM »
This in not really within the scope of this forum, but it does start off:

Cordite was widely used by the British with Mark I being the first version produced, with manufacturing starting in 1889.

which date does fall in the accepted time frame. 

I think it is an interesting, and concise,  look at what came after what we call black powder as a propellant.
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline cannonmn

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3345
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2012, 06:30:14 PM »
Don't forget that not everyone jumped right from black powder to smokeless.  In the US for example, Brown Powder or Brown Cocoa Powder came after black power for many big guns, then later everyone went to smokeless.  Here's an 1889 NYT article which has a good rundown on Brown Powder, how it was made, advantages, etc.  Brown Powder is an "advanced" form of black powder which has another material substituted for charcoal, and some other change in portions of ingredients.  Brown Powder is much slower-burning than black powder, and made the early, very long, "built-up guns" possible.
 
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=F70D13FC3F5E1A738DDDAC0A94D0405B8984F0D3

Offline Artilleryman

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1378
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2012, 01:26:25 AM »
Interesting article.
Norm Gibson, 1st SC Vol., ACWSA

Offline guardsgunner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 421
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #3 on: June 17, 2012, 04:05:24 AM »
Yep, very interesting.

Offline moose53

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 430
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #4 on: June 17, 2012, 07:05:07 AM »
Wow , cool article. Thanks for posting

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2012, 11:02:53 AM »
That's a great article, Cannonmn, thanks for the link.

That's one of the great things about this forum - the wealth of knowledge the regulars have, and the resources they know. 
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.

Offline Cannoneer

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3950
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2012, 11:42:49 AM »
This in not really within the scope of this forum, but it does start off:

Cordite was widely used by the British with Mark I being the first version produced, with manufacturing starting in 1889.

which date does fall in the accepted time frame. 

I think it is an interesting, and concise,  look at what came after what we call black powder as a propellant.

Subdjoe,
You didn't post a link or reference.
RIP John. While on vacation July 4th 2013 in northern Wisconsin, he was ATVing with family and pulled ahead of everyone and took off at break-neck speed without a helmet. He lost control.....hit a tree....and the tree won.  He died instantly.

The one thing that you can almost always rely on research leading to, is more research.

Offline subdjoe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3036
  • Gender: Male
Re: Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2012, 02:18:08 PM »
OOPS!! I must have overwritten it.  Try this:

Naval Propellants - A Brief Overview
Your ob't & etc,
Joseph Lovell

Justice Robert H. Jackson - It is not the function of the government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error.