I'm glad you can see the cross hairs in that reticle. I had the same scope on my 223 and swapped it out because I'd loose them against a dark background. They were just too fine for these old eyes
Other than that, I liked the scope. For a fairly inexpensive scope, I thought the quality was excellent. They're nice and clear., and you're right about the adjustments being great. The parralax adjustment works well.
That was nice shooting. I had a great morning with the "new" .22-250. We just finished second cutting alfalfa, so the range was clear. I bought the rifle used with a Tasco Euro Class 3-12 X 52 on it. The rifle would not shoot. Changed scopes....same thing. I sent it up to Brian. He re-barreled it and it's now a tack driver with the original scope. I fine tuned it to 300 yards yesterday morning. My last three shots were two touching and the third 3/4 inch right. All center of the target. I wish I could shoot like that away from the bench
I know you've told before about using the .223 for squirrels and posted the load, but I don't recall what it was. I know you said you had less meat damage than with a .22. Interesting. I'm going to play with that this fall. One of my dogs "Charlie", a Feist, needs some field work before season, so I think I'll take him out this coming week and knock off some reds. I'll probably use a .32-20, either the Handi or the Marlin. A lot of folks don't use a rifle for squirrels, but living in farm country, you instinctively line up the target with something solid behind it. It doesn't matter if it's a deer, woodchuck or squirrel. It's a lot more of a challenge to pop the head off a bushy tail rather than dust him with a shotgun.
If you get up this way, give me a jingle. Perhaps we can get together and shoot.
Pete