Author Topic: Something that hit my email today......A Warning (Read 911 times)

whitedogone · « **on:** February 09, 2004, 04:54:06 PM »

You know, it is easy to forget the 'promises' that Bill and Hillary made while in office.
It strikes home when it is listed like this: After the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, which killed six and injured 1,000; President Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1995 bombing in Saudi Arabia, which killed five US military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1996 Khobar Towers bombing in Saudi Arabia, which Killed 19 and injured 200 US military personnel; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 1998 bombing of US embassies in Africa, which killed 224 and injured 5,000; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. BUSH COVERED IT!
After the 2000 bombing of the USS Cole, which killed 17 and injured 39 US sailors; Clinton promised that those responsible would be hunted down and punished. BUSH COVERED IT!
Maybe if Clinton had kept his promise, an estimated 3,016 people in New York and Washington, DC that are now dead would be alive today. BUSH TOLD THOSE FIREMAN -- THEY WOULD HEAR US TOO!
And, now that Bush is taking action to bring these people to justice, we have opponents charging him with being a war monger... AN INTERESTING QUESTION:
This question was raised on a Philly radio call-in show. Without casting stones, it is a legitimate question.
There are two men, both extremely wealthy. One develops relatively cheap software and gives billions of dollars to charity. The other sponsors terrorism.
That being the case, why was it that the Clinton Administration spent more money chasing down Bill Gates over the past eight years than Osama bin Laden?
THINK ABOUT IT! It is a strange turn of events.
Hillary Clinton gets $8 Million for her detailing her memoirs. Bill
Clinton gets $12 Million for his memoirs, yet to be written. This from two people who have spent the past 8 years being unable to recall anything about past events while under oath!

Sincerely, Comdr. Hamilton McWhorter USN (Ret)

P. S. Please forward this to as many people as you can! We don't want this woman to even THINK of running for President
God Bless America

Big Blue · « **Reply #1 on:** February 10, 2004, 02:51:45 AM »

The worst part of this, is that the mainstream media doesn't remember anything of the Clinton's past either. They're starting anew with Kerry. He has spent the past few months bashing Bush about going to war in Iraq, while most of his statements a year ago were about why Bush isn't stopping the madman Sadam. The media forgot his statements as well.
Don

skoutfitter · « **Reply #2 on:** February 10, 2004, 09:48:27 AM »

Just finished watching the Presidents spokes person Scott McClellan field questions from the media for 45 min regarding the accusation of the President being AWOL while in the Guards. It is so outrageous it is hard to watch but the Dems threw it out there and it sprouted wings so the President is defending himself againt it. This in spite of the President producing payroll records and honorable discharge papers and the press still will not leave it alone. Must be the new strategy for the Dems just keep making things up until people believe its true. :cry: Sad Sad state of affairs.

.308 · « **Reply #3 on:** February 10, 2004, 10:29:35 AM »

90%+ of the mainstream media are liberal, at least vote that way. So tell me, do you think they may be a little biased. Naw, no way. Then why is it you can only hear both sides on 'mainstream' outlets like Fox, because people like my dear fellow Georgian Ted Turner control the mainstream media.

Just wait, if some dirt surfaces on one of the Dem. candidates you won't hear about it on ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC or CNN. If they play it, they'll play it in such a way as to make the Dem. look like a victim of a Right Wing plot. :x

Brett · « **Reply #4 on:** February 10, 2004, 11:48:11 AM »

It's interesting how when it was learned that Clinton did in fact dodge the draft the liberal media all but ignored it. However when an out right lie is made up about Bush's military service the liberal media is all over it like white on rice! :evil:

Brett

.308 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 11, 2004, 09:43:45 AM »

Here's something along the same lines: Hope ya'll don't mind.

Just another perspective on reality...............

----- Original Message -----

> The following appeared in the Durham, NC local paper as a letter
> to the editor.
>
> Liberals claim President Bush shouldn't have started this war.
> They complain about his prosecution of it. One liberal recently
> claimed Bush was the worst president in U.S. history.
>
> Let's clear up one point: We didn't start the war on terror. Try
> to remember, it was started by terrorists BEFORE 9/11.
>
> Let's look at the "worst" president and mismanagement claims. FDR
> led us into World War II. Germany never attacked us: Japan did. From
> 1941-1945, 450,000 lives were lost, an average of 112,500 per year.
>
> Truman finished that war and started one in Korea, North Korea
> never attacked us. From 1950-1953, 55,000 lives were lost, an average
> of 18,333 per year.
>
> John F. Kennedy started the Vietnam conflict in 1962. Vietnam
> never attacked us. Johnson turned Vietnam into a quagmire. From
> 1965-1975, 58,000 lives were lost, an average of 5,800 per year.
>
> Clinton went to war in Bosnia without UN or French consent, Bosnia
> never attacked us. He was offered Osama bin Laden's head on a platter
> three times by Sudan and did nothing.
>
> Osama has attacked us on multiple occasions. In the two years
> since terrorists attacked us, President Bush has liberated two
> countries, crushed the Taliban, crippled al-Qaida, put nuclear
> inspectors in Lybia, Iran and North Korea without firing a shot, and
> captured a terrorist who slaughtered 300,000 of his own people. We
> lost 600 soldiers, an average of 30 a year. Bush did all this abroad
> while not allowing another terrorist attack at home.
>
> Worst president in history? Come on!

TOMMYY01 · « **Reply #6 on:** February 11, 2004, 10:37:02 AM »

If you watched the news yesterday, Kerry had no comment on the Bush military thing. Just wait. I learned from being on archerytalk.com in the soap box forum, about Kerry's stint in the military. It was unbelievable. He hooked up with Jane Fonda in the early 70's. And for us military, you know how we feel about her. So if Kerry wins the Dem. nomination, Just watch out for the fireworks start when they bring up the low down stuff that Kerry did before. You will definately be surprised.
tommy

.308 · « **Reply #7 on:** February 11, 2004, 11:02:50 AM »

I can't wait. I just hope the Republicans can stay away from the 'mudslinging.'

BTW there was a Newsweek poll on the web today, I think it was on the MSN homepage, asking if you approved of the job the Prez is doing, etc. Lots of gay marriage stuff. Newsweek ain't gonna like the results and I'll betcha a pretty penny they won't publish the results. Here's the link if you're interested. :-D

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/4205947/

handirifle · « **Reply #8 on:** February 11, 2004, 11:16:41 AM »

Letssee if this works! Here were the present results after I voted.

Live Vote
Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president?

Approve

Disapprove

Don't Know

In general, would you like to see George W. Bush re-elected to another term as president, or not?

Yes

No

Don't know

Suppose the next GENERAL ELECTION for president were being held TODAY and you had to choose between George W. Bush, the Republican, and John Kerry, the Democrat. Who would you vote for?

Bush

Kerry

Undecided/Other

Do you think there should or should NOT be legally-sanctioned gay marriages?

Should

Should not

Don't know

Do you think there should or should NOT be legally-sanctioned gay and lesbian unions or partnerships?

Should

Should not

Don't know

Would you favor or oppose a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage in all states?

Favor strongly

Favor somewhat

Oppose strongly

Oppose somewhat

Don't know

Thinking about the last four American first ladies, who comes closest to your image of what a first lady should be?

Hillary Clinton

Laura Bush

Barbara Bush

Nancy Reagan

Don't know

Vote to see results

The percentages labeled Newsweek Magazine represent the results of the national poll, not including your responses. The percentages labeled WEB are results from this online poll and include your responses. The NEWSWEEK poll was conducted by Princeton Survey Research Associates, which interviewed 1,004 adults by telephone on Feb. 5 - 6. The margin of error is plus or minus 3 percentage points. For those questions which surveyed registered voters, 822 people were interviewed, and the margin of error is plus or minus 4 percentage points. For those questions which surveyed Democrats and Democratic leaners, 383 people were interviewed and the margin of error is plus or minus 5 percentage points. Internet surveys are not scientific polls.
Live Vote

* Percentages may not total to 100% for each question due to non-responses

Do you approve or disapprove of the way George W. Bush is handling his job as president? * 63600 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Approve 60% 48%
Disapprove 38% 45%
Don't Know 1% 7%

In general, would you like to see George W. Bush re-elected to another term as president, or not? * 63603 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Yes 60% 45%
No 38% 50%
Don't know 2% 5%

Suppose the next GENERAL ELECTION for president were being held TODAY and you had to choose between George W. Bush, the Republican, and John Kerry, the Democrat. Who would you vote for? * 63691 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Bush 61% 45%
Kerry 36% 50%
Undecided/Other 3% 5%

Do you think there should or should NOT be legally-sanctioned gay marriages? * 63399 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Should 23% 33%
Should not 67% 58%
Don't know 10% 9%

Do you think there should or should NOT be legally-sanctioned gay and lesbian unions or partnerships? * 63342 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Should 40% 41%
Should not 51% 51%
Don't know 9% 9%

Would you favor or oppose a constitutional amendment that would ban gay marriage in all states? * 63460 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Favor strongly 48% 47%
Favor somewhat 8% 43%
Oppose strongly 32% 4%
Oppose somewhat 7% 45%
Don't know 5% 35%

Thinking about the last four American first ladies, who comes closest to your image of what a first lady should be? * 63693 web responses

RESPONSES WEB Newsweek Magazine

Hillary Clinton 25% 31%
Laura Bush 40% 20%
Barbara Bush 18% 20%
Nancy Reagan 9% 20%
Don't know 7% 9%

handirifle · « **Reply #9 on:** February 11, 2004, 11:20:45 AM »

There is also a picture floating around of Missie Jane Fonda in a war protest and guess who's in the backround? Why the Democratic front runner of course! Sure hope he is bush's opposition.

Very interesting read on the presidents, except I don't think it's 100% accurate. we were in Nam long before Kennedy was in office and the Gremans did sink the Lucitania (SP?) which had Americans on it.

.308 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 11, 2004, 11:28:17 AM »

Yeah, you got it working. I truly believe poll results most of the time reflect the pollster's agenda/preferences. :roll: Notice the big differences between the Newsweek magazine poll and the Newsweek web poll. How can that be??? :oops: For instance Laura Bush is twice as popular on the web as in the magazine, and the reverse for dear ol' Hillary. :-D :-D G.W. is below 50% in their rag, and 60% and above on the web. :wink:

.308 · « **Reply #11 on:** February 11, 2004, 11:38:11 AM »

I hate to admit it but I'm like a lot of folks, I have a short memory. :oops: I had plum forgot that Mr. Kerry and Ms. Fonda "KNEW" one another. In the Biblical sense. :eek: :-D Thanks for reminding me. :wink: She was also married to one of our dearest Georgians. I do remember that, what a couple. Couple of what, I have no idea. :shock: