My understanding of this case is: There were two murders connecting the gun found in the man's SHARED apartment/home. My understanding there was DNA on the victim that matched this poor hapless critter of misfortune. That would seem to kinda put tha boy in the middle of things wouldn't it.
Thru all the appeals and such, apparently "the evidence STOOD". There's always gonna be some cluelessly compassionate sympathizers regardless of the circumstances, who has absolutely zero experience in this relm, but has an unfavorable opinion on putting a worthless dog down.
Given that, and taking their lack of knowledge on such matters, push the drugs, tie the rope, or flip the switch, and let's get'em in the ground.
