Author Topic: Ruger 1911  (Read 1304 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Ruger 1911
« on: November 11, 2012, 11:29:26 AM »
Anyone seeing these on display for sale?  If so, are the prices full suggested retail?  I have yet to see one for sale. 

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2012, 11:42:57 AM »
Around here they are $800.00.  I bought my Remington R1 for $600.00 out the door instead.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline Savage

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4397
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2012, 02:45:26 PM »
A couple of guys in one of my clubs have the Rugers. They are a nice pistol. They are IMO worth the wait and the price. Ruger had a promotion here a few weeks ago, $699. If I were buying a production 1911 these days I'd pick one up.
Savage
An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last,

Offline 1911crazy

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4793
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2012, 07:09:04 AM »
Don't forget the ruger is an investment casted frame.

Offline ole 5 hole group

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 275
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2012, 04:09:36 AM »
Here's one but when it's all said and done - it'll probably be close to $800.00
http://www.rugerforum.com/phpBB3/viewtopic.php?f=41&t=164254

Offline Mike in Virginia

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1551
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #5 on: November 17, 2012, 02:44:09 PM »
I don't get it.  Has Ruger ever had a production gun so difficult to find?  I really would like to have one.  I suppose that is exactly why they get snatched up.  Everyone wants one.  From all my research, the gun does not have a down side.  First one I see, I'm gettin' it. 

Offline earthling121757

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Posts: 2
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2012, 06:27:50 AM »
Hi all,

First post here, but been reading GBO going on four years...

Just wanted to say I purchased a Ruger SR1911 about three weeks ago. Found it on gunbroker.com NIB for $655. Another $50 for shipping and FFL fee, so $705 "out the door".

Took it to the range last Saturday and shot a box of Blazer Brass ammo. I must say, it's a really sweet gun. My only complaint is there is no magazine loader widget with it like I got with my Ruger P-95 so fingers got a bit sore loading the magazines.

Look around on-line and you can find 'em. The local dealers here couldn't seem to find any though.

This is my first 1911, and I think I'm in love....  ;D

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2012, 09:23:55 AM »
Don't forget the ruger is an investment casted frame.

Is that a bad thing ?
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2012, 09:38:28 AM »
Very much so....
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2012, 09:39:14 AM »
Why is that ? Most consider Ruger guns stronger and use them more for custom work that must take higher than normal pressures over more conventional forged guuns .  ???
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Swampman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (44)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 16518
  • Gender: Male
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2012, 10:32:50 AM »
Only because they are overbuilt (too heavy) for the cartridges they are chambered in.
"Brother, you say there is but one way to worship and serve the Great Spirit. If there is but one religion, why do you white people differ so much about it? Why not all agreed, as you can all read the Book?" Sogoyewapha, "Red Jacket" - Senaca

1st Special Operations Wing 1975-1983
919th Special Operations Wing  1983-1985 1993-1994

"Manus haec inimica tyrannis / Ense petit placidam sub libertate quietem" ~Algernon Sidney~

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #11 on: November 21, 2012, 11:19:32 PM »
Don't forget the ruger is an investment casted frame.

Is that a bad thing ?


Not at all...

There are plenty of aluminum-framed 1911s out there as well as many other 45 ACP pistols with aluminum frames. Kimber and Sig come to mind. An investment cast stainless steel frame made by Ruger (expert in investment cast parts) is going to be much more durable than any aluminum one. It should last just as long as any forged or billet machined frame using a low-pressure round like the 45  ACP.

BTW, the SR1911 is rated for +P ammo. ;)
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2012, 02:22:33 AM »
Yes I knew that but wanted Swampy's reasoning  ::)
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline Victor3

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (22)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4241
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #13 on: November 27, 2012, 12:32:42 AM »
 I understand. It's always best to get undeniable 'facts' straight from the authority.  ;)
"It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly, one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts."

Sherlock Holmes

Offline Mikey

  • GBO Supporter
  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8734
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #14 on: November 27, 2012, 02:00:11 AM »
Aluminum frames - longevity?  Ed Clarke has built compettition pistols on aluminum frames that have gone more the 50 thousand rounds without any problems. 
A auto pistol rated for +P - will someone please take a look at a reloading manual to figure out what might constitute a +P round, or let me give you a example.  From todays factory loads, a 230 gn 45 acp at 850'/sec is a standard pressure (P) round, even though the factory velocity used to be 877'/sec from a gov't model 5" bbl;  a 230 gn 45 acp at 875'/sec is now a +P round - the +P means increased pressure.  A 230 gn 45 acp slug at 900'/sec is now considered +P+ and this category goes up to 930'/sec or faster. 
A review of handloading manuals that use actual firearms for testing, not bolt style pressure barrels, takes the 230 gn 45 slug to 972'/sec, all from the same pistol tested. 
Hell, the concept of a +P rated semi-auto pistol is like calling barak obama a good president.
 

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Ruger 1911
« Reply #15 on: November 27, 2012, 06:33:38 AM »
The failure on al frame 1911's I have seen were all where the pin hold the main spring housing cracked the frame. Never saw a steel one do so .
If ya can see it ya can hit it !