Author Topic: Benghazi reports.....finally.  (Read 292 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Benghazi reports.....finally.
« on: November 02, 2012, 10:32:07 PM »
Intelligence officials have disclosed a new detailed timeline of the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi, acknowledging the CIA played a greater role in responding to the attack than has previously been disclosed. A senior U.S. intelligence official also insisted that the CIA security team that initially responded to the attack was not given orders "to stand down in providing support," as had been suggested in media reports.
The timeline provided by a senior U.S. intelligence official gives the first precise account of how CIA security teams provided the first response to the Sept. 11 attack on the diplomatic mission in Benghazi, which killed four Americans, including Ambassador Chris Stevens.
The attack has become a political hot potato in the presidential campaign, with conservatives accusing the administration of not being transparent. The State Department has previously released a detailed account of the night's events, but did not acknowledge a CIA role in the response. The timeline given by a senior Intelligence official confirms that the facility previously described by the State Department as an annex, was in fact, a facility housing CIA security officers. It does not provide any additional details on the current intelligence assessment that the attack was an opportunistic result of earlier protests that day outside the U.S. embassy in Cairo over an anti-Muslim movie.
The official says there was "no second guessing" of those on the ground in Libya by senior officials either in Libya or Washington.
"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," said the official. The official's comments appeared to be a direct rebuttal of a Fox News report that CIA teams on the ground had been told by superior officers to "stand down" from providing security support to the consulate.
According to the official, upon learning of the attack at the consulate, the security team at the annex responded "as quickly and effectively as possible." The official described how the security team tried to rally additional support from local Libyan forces and heavier weapons, but that when that could not be accomplished "within minutes" they moved out to the compound. The official called the security team "genuine heroes" who risked their lives to save those at the compound.
According to the new timeline the annex received a call at 9:40 p.m. local time that the consulate was coming under attack. A team of six CIA security operatives left the annex for the mission within 25 minutes of that call.
Over the next 25 minutes the security team approached the compound and attempted to secure heavy weapons. They encountered heavy enemy fire when they entered the consulate compound to locate Stevens and the other Americans who were there at the time of the attack.
At 11:11 p.m., an unarmed U.S. military surveillance drone arrived over the compound. U.S. officials have told ABC News that the drone had been redirected to Benghazi from an ongoing mission elsewhere in Libya.
By 11:30pm, all of the Americans, with the exception of the missing Stevens, had left the compound in vehicles that immediately came under fire.
The annex itself came under sporadic small arms and RPG fire for the next 90 minutes before the attackers eventually dispersed.
At around 1 a.m. an additional CIA team of about six security officers from the embassy in Tripoli had arrived at Benghazi. U.S. officials have acknowledged that the embassy in Tripoli had chartered an aircraft to take the team to Benghazi. The official disclosed the new detail that two U.S. military officers were part of the team that flew in from Tripoli.
Upon learning that the situation at the annex had calmed down, the team that came in from Tripoli initially wanted to focus their attention on locating Stevens, who had been taken to a local hospital.
When the team finally managed to secure transportation and an armed escort into Benghazi, they learned that Stevens "was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain." At that point they headed to the annex to help evacuate the Americans located there .
They arrived at the annex at 5:15 a.m., just before mortar rounds begin to hit the complex. The attack killed two security officers, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, who were located on the annex's roof. Doherty had been part of the security team that had flown in from Tripoli. The new attack on the annex lasted only 11 minutes.
Less than an hour later everyone at the annex was evacuated with the help of "a heavily armed Libyan military unit. "
http://news.yahoo.com/detailed-account-benghazi-attack-notes-cias-quick-response-020906681--abc-news-politics.html
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline Cuts Crooked

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3325
  • Gender: Male
Re: Benghazi reports.....finally.
« Reply #1 on: November 02, 2012, 10:51:44 PM »
Finally!!!!!! Someone with an actual name is telling us something. :o
 
Pentagon on Benghazi Troop Movements: ‘Swift Action’ on Night of Attack
A day after the release of a new timeline of the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya, the Pentagon has released new details about the military forces moved that night in case they were needed in the region.
The timeline released Thursday by a senior U.S. intelligence official revealed the major role that CIA security forces in Benghazi and Tripoli, Libya, played in responding to the attack on the American consulate in Benghazi.
On Friday, Pentagon spokesman George Little provided new details of U.S. military movements made the night of the attack in case they were needed.
Little said that within a few hours of the Sept. 11 attack in Benghazi, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta ordered U.S. military forces to move to Sicily in preparation for an uncertain situation in Libya.
"This department took swift action," said Little. "It did respond, the secretary ordered forces to move.
"We were prepared for a range of contingencies in the course of this very tragic incident," said Little. "We were ready for the need to augment security measures at our facilities in Libya, if called upon. We were prepared for the possibility, for instance, of a hostage situation, as well. These were all the things that we were looking at for an event we did not know was going to happen in Benghazi that night. "
According to Little, Panetta ordered forces to move towards the naval air station in Sigonella, Italy, after conferring with Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Gen. Carter Ham, the commander of U.S. Africa Command who was in Washington for regularly scheduled meetings.
Among the units ordered by Panetta on the night of the attack to Sicily, which is less than 500 miles from Libya,were two special operations teams that were moved to Sigonella.
As previously reported, one of the units came from a U.S. military base in "Central Europe." And Little disclosed that Panetta also ordered another team from the United States to head to Sigonella. Little refused to describe what kind of unit was sent from the U.S., though it was presumably a special operations team trained for hostage rescues.
Little said both the units "did not arrive until after the entire sequence of events was complete. … They were in Sigonella many hours after the attacks."
The Pentagon spokesman said that it can take hours for troops to be organized and transported to where they might be used. He added that at the time they were ordered to move, policy makers "did not know when the attacks would end." Little said that, in theory, a hostage situation in Benghazi could have lasted for days.
"We didn’t have forewarning of this tragic event in Benghazi," Little said. "The entire U.S. government was starting from a cold start."
Another new detail disclosed Friday was that Panetta ordered the deployment of not one, but two platoons of specially trained Marines to protect U.S. diplomatic facilities in Libya.
Based in Rota, Spain, the platoons headed to Sigonella for possible deployment to Libya. One platoon was dispatched on Sept. 12 to protect the U.S. embassy in Tripoli. The other platoon was to have gone to Benghazi to secure the consulate compound, but was never sent after it was determined that all U.S. personnel had been evacuated from Benghazi.
Little reaffirmed that no other American aircraft were involved over Libya the night of the attack beyond the unarmed surveillance drone that arrived 90 minutes into the attack. As for reports that an AC-130 gunship could have been dispatched over Libya at the time of the attack, Little was clear that "there was no AC-130 within a continent’s range of Benghazi" that night
 
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/11/pentagon-on-benghazi-troop-movements-swift-action-on-night-of-attack/
 
Now, lest anyone misunderstand me, I am not convinced by the above stories! Too much time passed, which would allow the administration to make sure that everyone had their stories straight. But at least someone with an actual name is giving out information at last. Now, the only way the accusers can respond is with the names of those witnesses who they claim made statements about refusal of assistance, orders to stand down, air support denied.......which should have been done nearly two months ago!
 
Again, I certainly believe the Obee administration is fully capable of such chicanery, but if the accuzation is going to be made, it should have been made using the verfiable names of those claiming they were there and saw/heard/witnessed these things happening. I suspect those people don't exist, because only an idiot would make such claims, thinking they would never be called to account for making them.......but then again, there are a good number of idiots in the world. ??? ::)
Smokeless is only a passing fad!

"The liar who charms and disarms and wreaths himself in artifice is too agreeable to be called a demon. So we adopt the word "candidate"." Brooke McEldowney

"When a dog has bitten ten kids I have trouble believing he would make a good childs companion just because he now claims he is a good dog and doesn't bite. How's that for a "parable"?"....ME

Offline Lon371

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (53)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
  • Gender: Male
  • Why Not a Handi?
Re: Benghazi reports.....finally.
« Reply #2 on: November 02, 2012, 11:07:24 PM »
 I will wait for the investigation. Unless obumer gets back in, in which case there will be none.
 To many stories and none are even close. This could just be another story, election is around the corner.


Lonny


Offline boomerralph

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 159
  • Gender: Male
Re: Benghazi reports.....finally.
« Reply #3 on: November 03, 2012, 03:41:52 AM »
Food for thought.
 
This from a Patriot friend.  All my sentiments exactly.  You have to read this and send it on.
                                                    Tuesday October 30th - 2012  Some of you out there may be getting tired of my e-mails related to the election next week.  I understand.  However, since I firmly believe that this is the most important election in my lifetime, if I can convince just one person out there that American needs to get rid of the incompetent person who is a disgrace to the office of president of the United States in order to turn things around, it will have been worth it. I just received word of something very disturbing from an old fraternity brother who, like me, is a retired senior Naval Intelligence Officer, and still has numerous contacts in the Intelligence Community. The Benghazi mess continues and more collateral effects are becoming evident.  People in the military are spreading the word about what has been happening and how the Obama Administration and the LAME STREAM MEDIA is trying to suppress the news.  I hope General Carter Ham and Admiral Charles Gaouette go on O'Rielly or Hannity on FOX News and spill the entire story to the American people!!! This needs to happen immediately!!!  Google these officer's names if you have any doubts and due to social media and the Internet, many people are now beginning to learn the truth.  It is DISGUSTING and grounds for Impeachment as far as I am concerned.    Obama Fires Top Admiral For Advocating Libyan Rescue and also fires Top General as well.                               Admiral Charles Gaouette                                General Carter Ham
According to this report, Obama on October 27th ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) currently located in the Middle East.CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore. The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group’s current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG-108), USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius (DDG-69).US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for   “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.    This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.   General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:“The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.  General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.”                                                             
Ralph M. Reese
St. Augustine, FL

Offline magooch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6644
Re: Benghazi reports.....finally.
« Reply #4 on: November 03, 2012, 04:07:39 AM »
How is anyone supposed to believe the Obamaized version of what took place when it took the better part of a couple of months to get it out.  What is the explanation of why the place wasn't secured sufficiently ahead of time in light of the British and Red Cross pulling out and the date-- 9-11. 
I'm betting the lame stream media and the Dumycrats in Congress wouldn't have held off two minutes--let alone more than a month before they started raising holy hell if this had happened with a Republican in the White House.
 
Another thing; it wasn't Mitt Romney that made Obama and co. spread the lie about some stupid home made video causing a spontaneous riot at the compound.  They stuck to that story for weeks and if the revised version of events are right, they knew full well they were concocting a cover-up of their incompetence.  So they were lying then, now, or both.
 
Swingem

Offline Lon371

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (53)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2486
  • Gender: Male
  • Why Not a Handi?
Re: Benghazi reports.....finally.
« Reply #5 on: November 04, 2012, 12:36:52 AM »
SOS to CIA may have been sent way before attack

News
Fox News
by: Adam Housley
Saturday, November 3, 2012

SOS to CIA may have been sent way before attack
David Petraeus' CIA is in the thick of the Benghazi turbulence. Photo Credit:AP[/size]Despite a carefully narrated version of events rolled out late this week by the CIA claiming agents jumped into action as soon as they were notified of calls for help in Benghazi, security officials on the ground say calls for help went out considerably earlier — and signs of an attack were mounting even before that. ...
[/font][/size]According to the CIA, the first calls for assistance came at 9:40 p.m. local time from a senior State Department official at the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, to the CIA annex about a mile away.But according to multiple people on the ground that night, the Blue Mountain Security manager, who was in charge of the local force hired to guard the consulate perimeter, made calls on both two-way radios and cell phones to colleagues in Benghazi warning of problems at least an hour earlier. Those calls allegedly went to local security contractors who say that the CIA annex was also notified much earlier than 9:40 p.m. U.S. military intelligence also told Fox News that armed militia was gathering up to three hours before the attack began.

Read more:[/color]http://times247.com/articles/officials-in-libya-challenge-cia-account#ixzz2BFTApvn6




Like I said. I will wait for the investigation ;)


Lonny
[/font][/color]