Author Topic: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All  (Read 436 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« on: November 10, 2012, 04:09:35 PM »
 It is time to restore 1st class citizenship to white people by repealing  the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and all other laws against “racial discrimination.” 
 
 Now that  Barack Obama has been re-elected by an emerging,   newly empowered  non-white majority that is openly proclaiming the decline and eventual extinction of  the  shrinking white population,  the  Civil Rights Act of 1964 (CRA 1964), which raised non-whites to a  superior legal status and  relegated whites  to second class citizenship, NEEDS TO GO.  Now that non whites have achieved both numerical and political superiority, it is no longer necessary  to give them legal superiority as well.
 
 Slavery and the mis-named,  Orwellian  CRA 1964  are  morally identical because:   (1) Both  violate  the right of freedom of association; (2) Both violate the right of freedom of contract; and, (3) Both  impose racial caste systems by elevating  politically  favored races to superior legal status,  on the one hand, and by lowering  politically disfavored races  to  2nd class citizenship, on the other hand. 
 
 Under slavery,  legally superior white slave owners could  violate the rights of freedom of association of unwilling, legally subordinate blacks by forcing them into involuntary associations called slavery. 700,000 whites died to end this injustice to black people.   
 
 Under the CRA 1964, legally superior  non-whites  can force  unwilling, legally subordinate whites into a multitude of involuntary associations, contractual and otherwise.  The centuries old  law that “mutual assent” be part of every contract was abolished by this mis-named, oppressive law that gave non-whites the superior  legal power to force unwilling, legally subordinate  white people into “contracts” in violation of  age old right of freedom of contract. Not a single non-white will die to end this injustice to white people. 
 
 The CRA 1964 and other anti-discrimination laws  were never intended to and do not protect white people from  white hating, racially discriminatory non-whites.  These laws are now unnecessary with the ascendance of the non-whites to a  voting majority. 
 
 Whites need to protect themselves from racial discrimination and ultimate  extinction  by forming white communities, just as Blacks, Hispanics and Jews have formed theirs.   Whites need the protection of racially restrictive covenants in housing to protect white families from undesirables, the right of freedom of racial  association  in business and commerce to assure their livelihoods  and racially segregated schools to protect white children from racially motivated violence  and from  inferior quality education that has been  dumbed down to accommodate   non-whites, who justify low test scores on the grounds that higher level critical thinking skills are not “culturally relevant” to them.   If the non-white majority has  a right to its  own "culture,"  it is only fair that the shrinking white minority  should have an equal right to its own culture as well. 
 
 If Hispanics, Blacks and Jews can have their own racially separate communities, schools, curricula and institutions, it is  racial discrimination  to deny whites these same rights of freedom of  racial association as exercised by these other racial groups. 
 
 After decades of screaming about “white racism” and now calling for white extermination, non-whites should be happy to allow whites, whom they so  passionately and so  openly hate, to go their separate way and oppress them no more.   
 
 Repeal the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
 
 Equal Rights for  All, including Whites. 

Offline briarpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2012, 05:38:21 PM »
I expect congress to take that one up right after they restore lost freedoms and gun rights.
^    ^    ^     ^
This means:     


I dont think we have the makeup in the current government to change it in the next forever.
^^^^^

This is a CON

Offline ChungDoQuan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1417
  • Eisenhower Conservative
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2012, 01:21:31 AM »
THAT will go over well.  ::)
If you give up, THEY don't have to win.

"'Cause what they do in Washington, they just take care of number 1. And number 1 ain't you. $__t, you ain't even number 2!" Frank Zappa

The greatest idea the right ever had is personal responsibility; the greatest idea the left ever had is social responsibility. Both take effort.

The Founding Fathers had complete access to the Bible, but they came up with the Constitution as our governing document.

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5200
  • Gender: Male
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2012, 08:31:34 AM »
If you can debate this subject by actually talking about the pro's and con's......do so!
If you just want to flame it, I suggest you just put a lid on it!
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline dwalk

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 551
  • Gender: Male
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2012, 09:33:43 AM »
anyone who would introduce such a proposal would surely be labeled as being a "Racist".
like many other laws passed and proposed...they become convuluted and misapplied or misconstrued; both on purpose and unintentionally.
slavery, racism and bigotry existed long before the united states existed, still exists throughout the world, and probably always will.
passing, or repealing, a law will not change mankind.
its not the color of the skin, it's the content of the person that counts.
don't squat while wearing your spurs...will rogers

Offline yellowtail3

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5664
  • Gender: Male
  • Oh father of the four winds, fill my sails!
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2012, 10:06:48 AM »
anyone who would introduce such a proposal would surely be labeled as being a "Racist".
hey, if the shoe fits...
Jesus said we should treat other as we'd want to be treated... and he didn't qualify that by their party affiliation, race, or even if they're of diff religion.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #6 on: November 11, 2012, 10:25:14 AM »
anyone who would introduce such a proposal would surely be labeled as being a "Racist".
like many other laws passed and proposed...they become convuluted and misapplied or misconstrued; both on purpose and unintentionally.
slavery, racism and bigotry existed long before the united states existed, still exists throughout the world, and probably always will.
passing, or repealing, a law will not change mankind.
its not the color of the skin, it's the content of the person that counts.

The color of skin does matter under the 64 Civil Rights Act and a multitude of other "civil rights laws", the express purpose of which is to relegate people with white skin to second class citizenship.  That is the point of repealing them. 

Under the CRA 1964, non-whites receive superior legal status because of skin color.  Whites are relegated to subordinate legal status. 

None of these civil rights laws were intended to protect whites...only non-whites.  Skin color matters to the rulers of this country and to the non-whites who are  joyfully proclaiming  the  dispossession and demise of white people. 

If you believe that skin color doesn't matter, then you should oppose laws based on  skin color, like the CRA of 1964.  Now, non-whites openly brag about outnumbering and outvoting  whites and how they have the power and whites don't.  IF NON-WHITES BRAG THAT THEY HAVE ALL THE POWER, WHY DO THEY NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM WHITE PEOPLE WHO DON'T?

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7454
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #7 on: November 11, 2012, 04:34:29 PM »
Don't confuse the Civil Rights Act with Johnson's Great Society that made that destroyed the Negro Social structure by being Santa Claus which actually made the minority society whores for the government.

Although the asinine War on Drugs was equally guilty.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #8 on: November 11, 2012, 04:51:18 PM »
Don't confuse the Civil Rights Act with Johnson's Great Society that made that destroyed the Negro Social structure by being Santa Claus which actually made the minority society whores for the government.

Although the asinine War on Drugs was equally guilty.

I'm very much aware of the difference bweteen the CRA 1964 and the Great Society, both of which were abominable, both of which were  examples of white tax payers funding their own destruction.

Why do you make the Negros look like victims?  They received and white people paid. 

The CRA 1964 destroyed freedom of association for white people and denied white people the right to have a  social structure.  Every other race can organize and associate to advance their separate and distinct racial interests.  Only white people are denied the rights of freedom of association  with their own kind and the right to have pro-white organizations to advocate white interests. 

Whites can't have their own neighborhoods, schools,  businesses or anything else, but all the other races can.  Wouldn't it be nice for whites to be able to once again have nice, clean safe neighborhoods, schools and communities that couldn't be invaded and destroyed by other races?

 

Offline Bob Riebe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7454
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #9 on: November 11, 2012, 06:48:26 PM »
Don't confuse the Civil Rights Act with Johnson's Great Society that made that destroyed the Negro Social structure by being Santa Claus which actually made the minority society whores for the government.

Although the asinine War on Drugs was equally guilty.

I'm very much aware of the difference bweteen the CRA 1964 and the Great Society, both of which were abominable, both of which were  examples of white tax payers funding their own destruction.

Why do you make the Negros look like victims?  They received and white people paid. 

The CRA 1964 destroyed freedom of association for white people and denied white people the right to have a  social structure.  Every other race can organize and associate to advance their separate and distinct racial interests.  Only white people are denied the rights of freedom of association  with their own kind and the right to have pro-white organizations to advocate white interests. 

Whites can't have their own neighborhoods, schools,  businesses or anything else, but all the other races can.  Wouldn't it be nice for whites to be able to once again have nice, clean safe neighborhoods, schools and communities that couldn't be invaded and destroyed by other races?
NO, as a Christian I would prefer chaos to such self-righteous, self-centered acts that spit on Jesus sacrifice for all.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #10 on: November 11, 2012, 07:24:00 PM »
Don't confuse the Civil Rights Act with Johnson's Great Society that made that destroyed the Negro Social structure by being Santa Claus which actually made the minority society whores for the government.

Although the asinine War on Drugs was equally guilty.

I'm very much aware of the difference bweteen the CRA 1964 and the Great Society, both of which were abominable, both of which were  examples of white tax payers funding their own destruction.

Why do you make the Negros look like victims?  They received and white people paid. 

The CRA 1964 destroyed freedom of association for white people and denied white people the right to have a  social structure.  Every other race can organize and associate to advance their separate and distinct racial interests.  Only white people are denied the rights of freedom of association  with their own kind and the right to have pro-white organizations to advocate white interests. 

Whites can't have their own neighborhoods, schools,  businesses or anything else, but all the other races can.  Wouldn't it be nice for whites to be able to once again have nice, clean safe neighborhoods, schools and communities that couldn't be invaded and destroyed by other races?
NO, as a Christian I would prefer chaos to such self-righteous, self-centered acts that spit on Jesus sacrifice for all.

If you want chaos, you can have it.  Just move to an inner city non-white neighborhood that's controlled by drug dealers and street criminals.  If you want to commit suicide, go for it.

The rest of us want a decent life  for ourselves and for our children.   

 

Offline BUGEYE

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10268
  • Gender: Male
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #11 on: November 12, 2012, 02:59:09 AM »
After moving to town as a rising 8th grader, I went to a segregated elementary and high school.
there was never the violence that you see now.
the black high school had a band and hot school lunches that we didn't.  the black school never locked the door to the gym, so at night and week-ends, black and white kids would go there and play basketball.   we got along great, unlike today where force is used to integrate.
Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     Patrick Henry

Give me liberty, or give me death
                                     bugeye

Offline briarpatch

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2053
  • Gender: Male
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #12 on: November 12, 2012, 03:45:02 AM »
People of all colors usually dont have a problem until the government tells them they do.

Offline lgm270

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1862
Re: Repeal the '64 Civil Rights Act; Equal Rights for All
« Reply #13 on: November 12, 2012, 05:46:00 AM »
People of all colors usually dont have a problem until the government tells them they do.

Very well put.