Author Topic: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)  (Read 743 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5208
  • Gender: Male
Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« on: April 09, 2013, 09:05:54 AM »




One more reason I prefer the NO compromise approach by the G.O.A. These tactics that Alan G. of the Second Amendment Foundation and other groups  propose are simply more gun control at a warmer temperature.Chipping away at or rights until none are left to defend.Sad day for gun owners in the state of Washington, and freedom lovers all over. The very ones we support to represent, and even pay them to do it, Turn us over to the enemy. :'(
http://seattletimes.com/html/localnews/2020389406_backgroundcheckxml.html
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline Oldshooter

  • GBO subscriber and supporter
  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6426
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2013, 09:21:56 AM »
Seems to me that gotlieb has turned judas. No compromise! Everytime someone compromises with leftist they get burned. Ask Herbert Walker Bush. or read his lips!  ::)
“Owning a handgun doesn’t make you armed any more than owning a guitar makes you a musician.”

"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2013, 09:26:33 AM »
 It seems like a game , they wait until some people /kids get killed the propose more laws than could get passed then offer comprise or better yet get conservatives to beg for comprise . AND NONE OF IT WOULD HAVE SAVED ANYONES LIFE IN THE STATED CASES.
If ya can see it ya can hit it !

Offline mechanic

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (32)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5112
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2013, 10:30:27 AM »
Lets not forget, the goal is no guns for the masses at all.  They will do it incrementally or in one fell swoop if they can, but that is the goal.  As far back as Clinton Janet Reno said as much.
 
We have a situation where many of those hired to serve us, something now think they are better than their employer.  They pass healthcare laws and exempt themselves.  They pass gun laws but have bodyguards for life....
We have enough gun laws now.  The kid at Sandy Hook broke many.
 
Ben
Molon Labe, (King Leonidas of the Spartan Army)

Offline bilmac

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (14)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3560
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2013, 11:28:04 AM »
Mechanic said it, the Libs have learned not to go for the whole enchalada at once, they loose their jobs when they do that. The strategy is to nibble the second amendment away. Everybody knows that semiauto rifles are involved in a minor minor fraction of gun crimes, but that is what the libs are going after. WHY?? Because that is what they see as the most extreme position gun supporters have. This is the easiest little nibble they think they can get. If they could get semi autos banned gun crime would hardly be affected. And so we will be needing to ban Saturday night specials. And after that another nibble and another and another.

Offline nw_hunter

  • Moderators
  • Trade Count: (4)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 5208
  • Gender: Male
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2013, 05:18:50 AM »
Lets not forget, the goal is no guns for the masses at all.  They will do it incrementally or in one fell swoop if they can, but that is the goal.  As far back as Clinton Janet Reno said as much.
 
We have a situation where many of those hired to serve us, something now think they are better than their employer.  They pass healthcare laws and exempt themselves.  They pass gun laws but have bodyguards for life....
We have enough gun laws now.  The kid at Sandy Hook broke many.
 
Ben


Exactly why we need to reign in the political party and groups that supposedly represent us from time to time. They become infiltrated with left leaning leaders that are for the most part self serving. To Hell with the members! I see the Republican party and the NRA full of them at the highest level.Time for cleaning house is WAY over due.
Freedom Of Speech.....Once we lose it, every other freedom will follow.

Offline SHOOTALL

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23836
Re: Why Not (NO COMPROMISE?)
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2013, 05:30:52 AM »
Not to take up for anyone but often one party gives on one bill and the other on another. Of course the Rep party has been coming out on the bottom lately. Now if this was a concession to get support for killing part or all of the OHP then it might be worth while as now it is becoming apparent it will cost way to much and be almost impossible to get on line in time. Which might be why all the debate on guns , to take the heat off the Obama HC
 But also many voters want to vote for the winner regardless of their record and if the rep party fails voters this time it could mean doom and gloom next year.
If ya can see it ya can hit it !