Author Topic: Privatization of medicaid payment inKansas by our ultra conservative gov dismal.  (Read 293 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline guzzijohn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3034

 
 
 
  Eagle editorial: KanCare providers get squeezed   
  • Published Friday, Jan. 31, 2014, at 12 a.m.
 
 
 
Photos
 
1 of 1       
 
  •                     Is this how privatization of Medicaid saves the state money? height=191        Is this how privatization of Medicaid saves the state money?
     
 
Delayed and denied payments from KanCare’s private insurance companies have gotten so bad that some service providers aren’t accepting Medicaid patients from certain companies.
Is this how privatization saves the state money? Is this what the providers of long-term care to Kansans with intellectual and developmental disabilities have to look forward to, now that the state has received federal approval to include these services in KanCare?
Deb Voth, president of Rainbows United in Wichita, told The Eagle editorial board that 90 percent of her agency’s billings to one of the managed-care organizations has not been paid. As a result, it is not accepting any more patients through that MCO.
Overall, nearly 50 percent of Rainbows’ billings to the three MCOs is in arrears, Voth said – and that is after Rainbows had an attorney shake some payments from the companies.
The Hutchinson Clinic sent a letter to its Medicaid patients last month telling them it might drop its contracts with two of the MCOs because of payments problems. Michael Harms, the clinic’s chief financial officer, told the Kansas Health Institute News Service that the clinic has had problems with “thousands of claims” and is behind “hundreds of thousands” of dollars in payments.
Though they haven’t dropped their contracts, other hospitals and clinics throughout the state also are frustrated with payment delays. Unpaid claims of 90 days or more at Wesley Medical Center and Via Christi Health in Wichita are double what they were prior to privatization.
Denied claims are also an issue. Between January and November 2013, more than 2.2 million KanCare claims were denied – about 16 percent of all claims. Wesley had more than $3.7 million in denied claims last year.
The delays and denials have been particularly hard on smaller providers, which have limited financial or legal resources.
Carrie Barker, who owns A 2 Z Helping Hands – a home health company with offices in Derby and Arkansas City – told The Eagle that she hasn’t received about $50,000 in reimbursements from the three MCOs.
“I feel like they’re trying to run us out of business, but they’ll still get their money (from the state),” she said.
Bureaucratic hassles also have increased the administrative costs of providers. Wesley had to hire additional staff to manage billing issues. Rainbows paid more than $15,000 in legal fees to negotiate autism contracts with the MCOs.
The state withheld 3 percent of its payments to the MCOs last year as an incentive to meet certain performance requirements, such as prompt processing of claims. State officials say they won’t know until early spring whether the companies will receive their 3 percent withholdings.
But even if it keeps all or part of those withholdings, that won’t help the hospitals and clinics still waiting to get paid.

Read more here: http://www.kansas.com/2014/01/31/3258816/eagle-editorial-kancare-providers.html#storylink=cpy

Offline Conan The Librarian

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4494
  • McDonalds. Blecch!
GuzziJohn:
 
You guys must be spoiled. It's a lot worse that in Minnesota, and has been for a long time. Lots of middle men get a cut. Vast corruption.
 
I'm not so sure an argument against privatization is the answer when compared to public management of the funds. In Minnesota, 2/3 of the state's spending is to health and human services (welfare of some kind), and less than 8% of that money actually ends up in the hands of the people it is intended for. I.e., 92 percent goes to administration.
 
It seems like the Kansas situation is that at least the money is available, it's just slow. And slow may actually be good if they are taking time to check for fraud in the process.
 
When I see stuff like this I wonder what kind of a 10th century system Medicaid is. Modern systems have service level agreements built into them. For example, pay in full within 30 days or you pay a pentalty. From what I've seen, the government has penalties like that when you need to pay them, but not when they need to pay you.
 
Since it's such a big deal for doctor accounts receivable, maybe a law change to guarantee them payment on a predictable schedule is all that is needed. This is entirely fixable. My guess is that the slow pay people in Kansas are floating the money.