From the Article:
"This morning, we received a redacted Affidavit that does not contain the individual's name, signature or contact information. As it stands, our office has not yet received a formal complaint and cannot conduct an investigation without such critical details."
Last time I checked this is known as hearsay "evidence". An UNSIGNED affidavit is as useless as an unwritten land contract.
So much for "The evidence is clear." I hope they are not pinning their hopes on this getting any traction in court... Perhaps they should not were their masks so long!!!
Yes, that statement (now in purple) which you pasted above, did come from the article, but it was of course the words of the attorney general of Nevada, appointed by their far left radical AG.
That slippery AG whines that the the affidavit doesn't contain the individual's, "name, signature, or contact information"
Well my..my..isn't it that kind of a witnesses, the democ-rats had our whole country tied up with for nearly 4 years of Mueller and the phony 'impeachment' charges?