Author Topic: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...  (Read 407 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline ironglows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4387
For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« on: December 05, 2020, 04:23:59 AM »
  It is hard to reason to anyone who perhaps has not viewed the the testimonies produce by Rudy, can say "no evidence" !
  Here's the challenge...view that and tell uys ..."no evidence"..   Friend, these are swoen affidavits, something they can go to jail for, if they are lying!

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bo0lB1e_RI&list=PLQQ9h1eV-ZRhemlu_84nlArSd07lmzQhf

  If that video is too long to maintain your concentration, then here is a short, 5 minute one for you!

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2f3aw9rk30
"They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns, then it will be through the bullet"      (Saul Alinsky) ...hero of the left..

Offline Argent 88

  • GBO DJ
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3768
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2020, 04:47:31 AM »
The thing about all those testimonies is, they all are about the same in what they say was happening.
Even being from different states and in no way knew each other.

Offline Dee

  • Trade Count: (2)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 23870
  • Gender: Male
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2020, 04:48:21 AM »
There's enough evidence to send several thousand folks to jail.

But you have to find PROSECUTORS, and judges to hear the cases.

Socialism is in a hurry.
You may all go to hell, I will go to Texas. Davy Crockett

Offline NWBear

  • Trade Count: (3)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 655
  • Gender: Male
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2020, 06:39:10 AM »
"But you have to find PROSECUTORS, and judges to hear the cases."

That is the problem with a democratic republic... Too many opinions.  I believe Dee or Land Owner proposed a kind dictator as a possible solution.  As a freshman a friend said the best form of government was a "Benevolent" dictator.  From efficiency sake I agree, the problem is finding a "benevolent" dictator who stays that way - so far that has never worked.  I like our 3 part federal government, and distributed governance (ie state govt's. feeding into the fed's).  Clumsy and hard to get stuff done at times but a good stop against radical changes.

Offline VA Rifleman

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • *****
  • Posts: 705
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #4 on: December 05, 2020, 07:13:26 AM »
"But you have to find PROSECUTORS, and judges to hear the cases."

That is the problem with a democratic republic...

With fixed elections, there is no Republic.
Ammunition is like firewood. The more you have, the warmer you feel.

Offline ironglows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4387
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #5 on: December 05, 2020, 09:48:12 AM »
With fixed elections its a tyrannical dictatorship of elite plutocrats, facilitated by their propaganda pressitutes.
.
.TM7

  Touche' TM, excellent description !
"They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns, then it will be through the bullet"      (Saul Alinsky) ...hero of the left..

Offline ironglows

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4387
Re: For those who say Guliani has no "evidence"...
« Reply #6 on: December 05, 2020, 09:52:26 AM »
"But you have to find PROSECUTORS, and judges to hear the cases."

That is the problem with a democratic republic... Too many opinions.  I believe Dee or Land Owner proposed a kind dictator as a possible solution.  As a freshman a friend said the best form of government was a "Benevolent" dictator.  From efficiency sake I agree, the problem is finding a "benevolent" dictator who stays that way - so far that has never worked.  I like our 3 part federal government, and distributed governance (ie state govt's. feeding into the fed's).  Clumsy and hard to get stuff done at times but a good stop against radical changes.

  The globalists, to include billionaires, media, academia etc all want a "one world government' with what one may call a benevolent dictator..  Problem is, nearly all dictators start out as benevolent!

  "power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely" (George Santayana)

    ...And when that leader turns corrupt, hen where to 'refugees' flee to ? 

  Read your Bible...it's in there !  Problem is, most billionaires, globalists, media and academia types, have turned away from God.  One day they will dearly wish they had not done so.
"They have the guns and therefore we are for peace and for reformation through the ballot. When we have the guns, then it will be through the bullet"      (Saul Alinsky) ...hero of the left..