State of Texas Files Federal Law Suit Against Swing States In Supreme Court!

[Dee]

As TN said. God Bless Texas.

The GA state reps are worried about pushing back against the fraud. Saying the left will burn down Atlanta and blame them. So in other words, intimidation from the left wing mob works.

We on the right need to get organized.  Not for civil war but to provide a counter balance. The lack of organized pushback from avg citizens is our greatest weakness as the Pols we elected as our representatives are not up to the job.

Forgive me, but if the left wants to burn down the cities they live in, I do not care who they blame. Winter is cold.

As long as it isn't the taxpayers who have to rebuild them. Make Soros do it he's an instigator in all this.

One real way conservatives could organize is to stop funding the left's antics. Stop buying from them, stop watching them (to include the professional minstrels who call themselves *cof "athletes") stop using their platforms, just stop. You can't make Soros do anything, but you can bleed his wallet.

Been saying that for years TN. Cut off the money, and cut off their voice.

[VA Rifleman]

Twitter link. Not sure if it will work. GA pols greatest concern is persec.

Right wing organization = Tea Party. Crushed by Lois Learner.

Left wing organization = Antifa. Appears to have get out of jail free card. Ask Rand Paul.

https://mobile.twitter.com/disclosetv/status/1336362551177830404?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1336362551177830404%7Ctwgr%5E%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgeneraldispatch.whatfinger.com%2Fis-leftist-mob-rule-is-here-georgia-republican-state-veteran-legislators-are-afraid-if-they-call-a-special-session-blm-and-antifa-will-burn-down-atlanta-and-blame-them-for-it%2F

Don’t give a flip if the Left burns Atlanta. It does give me cause for concern if our elected officials are scared of doing the right thing.

[Dee]

Them good ole boys need to hook up. It could be a fight but this ain't no game.

[VA Rifleman]

Them good ole boys need to hook up. It could be a fight but this ain't no game.

Damn right Dee.

[VA Rifleman]

I’ll say again. We citizens need to get organized. If one looks at the totality of the 2020 election, we got steamrollered. Election stole fair and square.

The Left planned this for years, prepping the battlefield. The suits by Perkins Coie changing election law, Zukerburg funded ballot boxes in swing states, Sorus  funding Sec of State races, using Covid to push mail in voting, Dominion, big tech censorship, the rent a mob and on and on. They organized and planned. We didn’t.

What to do? Heck if I know but voting no longer works.

[oldandslow]

I'm seeing where NM had several thousand more votes cast in this election than there are registered voters in the state. I have no idea if it's true or not but I am positive about one thing. NM won't be joining in. It's ruled by corrupt democrats and they are perfectly happy with things as they are.

[teamnelson]

In case anyone cares, Mike Kelly's case to SCOTUS was not rejected in full, but in part only. He filed claiming 1) PA was acting unconstitutionally. And 2) asked that SCOTUS halt the certification process until SCOTUS heard the case. Two things. SCOTUS rejected the latter, the former is still on the table. They are requesting a cert to expedite the case, however given TX also names PA in their case, Rep Kelly's case may be heard in conjunction.

I realize that for some the facts, though interesting, are irrelevant, and they would rather believe SCOTUS unanimously rejected that there's voter fraud. For those that value facts, the legal process is open and verifiable. Sworn affidavits under penalty of jail numbering in the hundreds have been filed and are public record. Lots of evidence has been presented, and expert testimony provided. There is plenty to substantiate a case.

And given the historical moment we are in, it would not make sense for SCOTUS to sit this one out for any reason.
And someone remembers when an angry racist tried to block a black man from joining SCOTUS 30 years ago ...

[Argent 88]

Or recently, a Christian woman. Who is against abortion and the whole scale slaughter of the innocent.
For money, selling what human parts bring the highest price. It's ghoulish and evil.

[teamnelson]

Then in the background there's Sidney Powell saying both sides have been cheating for decades.
.
.TM7

And that is why there is deafening silence from certain Republican elected officials, and why Fox has been less enthusiastic on the subject.

[teamnelson]

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/22/22O155/163379/20201210144443769_Texas%20v.%20Pennsylvania%20-%20Motion%20and%20Br.%20of%20Amici%20DC%20et%20al.pdf

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND BRIEF FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA AND THE STATES AND TERRITORIES OF CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, DELAWARE, GUAM, HAWAII, ILLINOIS, MAINE, MARYLAND, MASSACHUSETTS, MINNESOTA, NEVADA, NEW JERSEY, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, NORTH CAROLINA, OREGON, RHODE ISLAND, VERMONT, VIRGINIA, U.S. VIRGIN ISLANDS, AND WASHINGTON AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A BILL OF COMPLAINT

In other words, they oppose Texas, and support PA, GA, WI, and MI. Filed by the AG of DC.

Ohio AG has filed their own brief in opposition, suggesting that SCOTUS cannot rule on this due to the Electoral Clause. His read is that the clause leaves it solely to the state to self-determine what constitutes a fair and free election.

If you feel strongly about this, might want to let your state government know.

[Dee]

Now there are 18 states supporting the Texas lawsuit.

[teamnelson]

I will be the first to admit I was wrong, IF the Supreme Court takes a case AND rules that ANY STATE's election or slate of electors is invalid, fraudulent, unconstitutional or any other finding which invalidates that State being counted for Joe Biden.  Check me on this.

It appears you are correct, and I confess I am shocked. SCOTUS has rejected the suit.

I do not believe that means the matter is settled, and SCOTUS made no comment that would indicate their opinion as to whether the elections in the 4 states  were valid or not. Any statements beyond that would be entirely conjecture. This is not a great day in American history. I believe darker days are coming.

[Dee]

All three of Trumps' SCOTUS appointees rejected the Texas lawsuit. Alito and Thomas are the only two that voted to take the case. I guess they didn't want to look "controversial".

I still ain't quiting until Trump quits.

[wtxbadger]

Same here on not giving up on Trump, never say die but no matter which way this ends up its still going to wind up in a civil war based on ideologies.

[Dee]

There are still several SCOTUS cases pending that have not been dismissed. If the 3 Supreme Court conservatives Trump appointed do not vote with Alito and Thomas to hear them, they will be a joke for the rest of their careers, and WE THE PEOPLE, will have watched a third world election theft with our very own eyes.

I always felt this day was coming, but not in my lifetime. I'm too old to run, and never mastered the habit anyway.

[NWBear]

I will be the first to admit I was wrong, IF the Supreme Court takes a case AND rules that ANY STATE's election or slate of electors is invalid, fraudulent, unconstitutional or any other finding which invalidates that State being counted for Joe Biden.  Check me on this.

It appears you are correct, and I confess I am shocked. SCOTUS has rejected the suit.

I do not believe that means the matter is settled, and SCOTUS made no comment that would indicate their opinion as to whether the elections in the 4 states  were valid or not. Any statements beyond that would be entirely conjecture. This is not a great day in American history. I believe darker days are coming.

TN
While I appreciate the affirmation, I agree with others this is not the end of cases which COULD be heard.  I still don't think they will.  A slight clarification of the Alito and Thomas disagreement.  Their belief is that a case BETWEEN STATES must be "heard" by the SCOTUS.  I don't think there are any other cases of state on state, but I may be wrong.  They also stated in their dissent that although they felt the case should be heard they were NOT inclined to grant any further relief.

We will see but I think this avenue is rapidly closing.  Right now I am researching the "sworn statements" I want to see the actual words in the statements, not what is being "reported".

[Dee]

You misunderstand, and misquote "the relief issue". The lawsuit was asking for relief in the time restraints that are fast approaching, and relief in the presentation of the case.
Thomas wanted to, and felt they should grant a hearing, but didn't feel they needed these reliefs regarding the hearing.

[Doublebass73]

After SCOTUS rejected to hear any of the 10 blatant 2nd Amendment violations before them this year I had no faith that they would do the right thing this time. They have already proven themselves worthless.

The only people who can fix this thing is ourselves.

[VA Rifleman]

The sound we are hearing is our beloved Constitutional Republic being flushed down the drain.

Nov 3rd 2020. A date which will live in infamy.