Author Topic: NEW SCOPE NEEDED HELP (Read 699 times)

DEPUTY · « **on:** March 13, 2004, 06:47:44 PM »

Ok, I'am looking for a new scope needs to have at least 3.5 -4 inches of eye relief, 2.5x10 or better but not over 14x and 50mm or under! looking at the monarch gold uc and the burris black diamond, or euro diamond! also swfa sample list for a good swarvoski or kahles i have a few of each of those now but i was really impressed by the nikon! i already have a few elites too, but they are so darn long, help aghhhhhhhhhh

Mueller Optics · « **Reply #1 on:** March 14, 2004, 03:02:57 AM »

Hey Deputy,
Just wanted to say its amazing how many people you meet unexpectedly and it was a pleasure to meet you at the Outdoorama show in Michigan. Small world aint it?

MO

Zachary · « **Reply #2 on:** March 14, 2004, 05:39:00 AM »

Quote from: DEPUTY

Ok, I'am looking for a new scope needs to have at least 3.5 -4 inches of eye relief, 2.5x10 or better but not over 14x and 50mm or under! looking at the monarch gold uc and the burris black diamond, or euro diamond! also swfa sample list for a good swarvoski or kahles i have a few of each of those now but i was really impressed by the nikon! i already have a few elites too, but they are so darn long, help aghhhhhhhhhh

Deputy,

It sounds like the Nikon Monarch is what you are looking for. The Golds are great, but kinda heavy, especially given their 30mm tubes.

In the monarch, take a look at the 3.5x-10x-50mm, the 4x-12x-40mm, or a myriad of other magnification and objective combinations. One of the many reasons that I like the Monarchs is that they have a nice rubber eye piece - not that I ever need it because the eye relief was plenty for the caliber that it was on.

Also, the new Leupold VX-IIIs have about the same eye relief as before - you may want to check those out too, especially given that their glass is (apparently) much better now.

Zachary

longwinters · « **Reply #3 on:** March 14, 2004, 03:37:15 PM »

I have Nikon Monarchs, Bushnell 4200, 3200 and Zeiss Conquest. I would take the conquest hands down. I really like the others, but the more I use the conquest the better I like it.

long

DEPUTY · « **Reply #4 on:** March 14, 2004, 07:23:49 PM »

Hey there small world it is indeed! were is my free testing scope! lol.
longwinters, i have had 2 zeiss conquest and both had had to be returned the first woudnt tract and the one the the lens came apart on me in 23 rounds! i cant afford that on a hunt on televison sorry! no leupolds for me either i have a couple of nice 4200's i like but i need eye relief, i like the monarch too but i like the gold side focus and the moa of a 30mm tube, i would love a monarch gold in a 3.5 x12 oh how nice it would be!, heck i might just end up with another swarvoski, but so far the gold is in the running until i can see the burris euro diamond series!

longwinters · « **Reply #5 on:** March 15, 2004, 12:17:26 PM »

Deputy, that is really tough luck to have on 2 scopes. My conquest is on a Sako 7mm. I have a buddy that has one on his Sako 300wsm and he likes it better than all of the scopes I have mentioned as well as his Kahles. But if, like you, I had 2 that were bad I would look else where also.

long