Good morning 243 shooters.
Can't help but love this round. Back in about 1958 I lived in Eastern Oregon - 7 miles from the nearest other folk. Wow what a place to grow up if you like to shoot.
Anyway, a fellow we had recently met was talking about a rifle he had won for 50 cents in Portland. The rifle just happen to be a Win. model 70 with a 4x Leupold w/dot.
Offering to let me shoot it, he handed me an old GI bag of 243 reloads and told me to get with it. Now I was already impressed, as I had seen shells in boxes of 20, 25 or 50 depending on the caliber or gauge, but I had never seen a bag of shells much less being handed an almost new rifle along with the bag and told to shoot.
To say I was impressed is an understatement. This was a for sure step up, from my .32 Win. Special w/iron sights. WOW! :grin:
Well, back to the question/problem. One of the very first things which IMHO needs to be done is - That brass needs to be kept separated as to number of times fired and number of times trimmed. Yes, the 243 will get a bit longer with repeated firings. The "improved" versons of this round will help that "problem," to some degree. And of course it should go without saying that this is not mixed brand and/or lot number brass.
I also expect that what is being said about the possible spring of the break open action could be a factor. However, I once had a Contender in 35 Rem. which never showed this problem. I realise the .35 is a lower pressure round, but when I got the barrel it came with a box of Rem. brass which had been fired an unknown number of times. When I sold the barrel, that same brass had been fired 17 times that I know of and it was still going strong.
One other factor that we as reloaders should take into considration IS, setting up our sizing die FOR THE CHAMBER OF OUR FIREARM.
The manufactures of both our reloading and shooting equipment are dealing with tolerances both plus and minus which are considered exceptable within the industry. Should you get a firearm at the max. end of these figures and a resizing die at the min. end, you are in trouble from the first crack out of the box. Everyone, has done what they were supposed to do, everything is within tolerances, and now is where the experienced reloader just might make the difference.
I - personally - first ran into this problem years ago with a 7mm mag. from which I just wasn't having the brass life I expected. This rifle had a long chamber (head to neck) and I was setting my sizing die as per recomendations so that the ram/shell holder would contact the base of the die and just slightly cam over on the up stroke. I short, I was over sizing my brass and every time a round was fired it would need to streach again (just ahead of the head/belt) to fill the chamber.
I now, and have for years, adjusted my sizing die for the firearm I have, and NOT as per the manufactures instructions. In this way, I lessen the repeated streaching of the brass EVEN if my combination of chamber/die happen to be on the max. end of the tolerances.
Anyway, it works for me!
Keep em coming! :wink: