Quickdtoo...your mentioning of the Ruger upgrades and how they still don't match the CZ got me thinking. I have a CZ 452 American in .17 HMR with a low-end Simmons 3 X 9 scope, and a Ruger 77/17 with the Nikon Buckmaster 4.5 X 14 scope, I finally took both of them to the range a few weeks ago to test which was better, and what brand of ammo works best in each. I have 4 CZ rifles so I know they are good guns.
What is odd is the Ruger was not as good as the CZ, even with the better scope, in the accuracy department. The trigger on the Ruger is slightly heavier, 5lbs, and the CZ is at 4 lbs (the CZ trigger has not been adjusted yet). The Ruger's barrel is rougher too, harder to clean, and you can feel the courser aspect when pushing the cleaning rod through it. I bought them to use for hunting, the CZ has been out several times for crows, it is lighter and more compact. I am reluctant to lighten the trigger too much as the hunting use is there.
Anyways, I have been thinking of installing a better barrel and a timney trigger on the Ruger, as you have mentioned, it might be a waste of money as it will not be as good as the CZ, especially as the Ruger replacement barrels are around $200.00. Would I be better off just putting in a timney trigger and waiting for the barrel to break in more?