oso/Joe,
The caption with that M1895G blowup picture stated it was likely a double-charged handload. The bore and chamber showed no obstruction.
Yeah, I'll say the shooter was lucky. He only got his left hand and arm mangled instead of blowing his head off.
It reminded me of other gun blowup pictures I've studied recently:
1. Springfield M1A blownup with factory German milsurp ball ammo. Shattered receiver ring, split & peeled back barrel/chamber, splintered stock. No evidence of bore or chamber obstruction.
2. .444 Marlin rechambered .44 Mag Thompson-Contender. Split open receiver, barrel split 2/3 length, shattered scope. No evidence of bore or chamber obstruction. Lengthened chamber job came close to factory scope mounting holes, and it appeared rupture started at the holes.
As much as I love to shoot and reload for my Marlin M1895 rifles, I've made it a point to stay the hell away from non-standard loads not documented in the reloading manuals. Ditto for reduced charges of ball powders!
That Big Marlin 1895 action may be ferociously strong, but I have NO desire to keep pumping near-proof pressures through it!
Chicken John