OK, here is the deal-I have an old k-7 series scope I sent to weaver, who is now simmons. Simmons states that my weaver is not "fixable" and are offering me 1/2 off suggested retail on a list of scopes. The two scopes that interest me most of what is offered are:
1. Classic V series 2-7X32 to put on either a Ruger #3 in .223 or a Ruger #1 in .243 for out of pocket cost of $95
or
2. Grand Slam 3-10X40 to sit on a sporterized springfield A303 in 30 06 out of pocket cost of $165
If i go with choice #1 then I'll probably get the a Bushnell 3200 3-9x40 for the springfield, or maybe a Burris Fullfield 3-9X40, or maybe even a Leupold Vari-II.
If i go with the Grand Slam then I'll probably get a 2-7x32 bushnell 3200 for one of the rugers.
Now, problem is I have NO reference point for ANY of the Weaver scopes I am being offered, but I do know Burris and Bushnell, so I am not sure which would be best for my purposes?? Now, if weaver scope are not that great I have a list of weaver optics to choose from including tactical scopes, bino's, and spotting scopes.
My first thought is to go with the choice #2, the 3-9X40 and save the $50 that it would cost for either the Bushnell or the Burris, but I am unsure of the quality of Weaver vs Bushnell/Burris. BUT, if Weaver stinks, then maybe I'll get go with the 2-7X40 or bino's/spotting scope???
So, what would YOU do? and how do these scopes compare with on and other???
Thank you
Dave