Author Topic: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?  (Read 7148 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26946
  • Gender: Male
Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« on: September 26, 2006, 10:01:22 AM »
I'm not happy with the two new MECs I've bought recently, they just aren't as smooth in function as the older ones I"ve used for many years. So I'm thinking on upgrading in quality and going to a progressive.

For the 28 gauge which is my primary skeet gauge I've asked Ponsness-Warren to provide me with a loader for a product review which I will of course keep after the test assuming all goes well. Details of keeping it would of course have to be worked out as it always does in such reviews. I like the idea of the hull being in a full length sizer at all stations on the PW and I've never heard a bad word about them.

So anyone here loading on a PW? If so which and how do you like it.

I think the 800 Plus is the machine I'm wanting to try, heck been wanting to try for a long time really. Does anyone know a reason to select the Platinum 2000 over it or vice versa?


800 Plus



Platinum 2000


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline G Curtis

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 40
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #1 on: October 05, 2006, 08:35:10 AM »
I have been using a very old 800B ( 2 digit serial number) in 12 gauge for trap loads. Best I can say is that it works just ok. Very fast to make shells - very fast to make garbage. Speaking as a working Mechanical Engineer I would say it is an engineering marvel. Speaking as a user it falls a little short of what I had hoped when I bought it. Overall I am mostly satisfied with it and I shoot the ammo loaded on it regularly. I just wish it was a little less fussy about working consistantly. Perhaps it is just my machine, I bought it second hand and it was dusty from years of sitting in a shop unused.

In using the machine I find that too much is going on at the same time to keep tabs on all of it. If a glitch comes up  I will sometimes forget to put in a wad or a hull. This results in a big mess or complicated timing issues to run one station through empty to the end. Biggest issue(most aggravating) is getting the crimps right on reloaded hulls that have been crimped before. The crimp starter is setup to self align with the existing crimp folds in the hull. It doesn't always do this and as I said above, too much going on to catch it every time and no good way to fix it if you do notice it. This gives poor crimps that often spew shot across the bench when the loaded shell is ejected out the bottom. I fixed my crimping problem by going to remmington hulls and not using the winchester aa's. Not sure why but it did help.

Again, perhaps it is just the machine I have but I find it rare that all adjustments are correct and stay that way for any length of time. Could be the wear my machine has - stripped screws, buggered metal pieces etc. Primer insertion punch has a tendency to drop and shallow seat primers. The whole primer feed system must be watched constantly. Crimping properly is a constant worry. If things go wrong and need attention it is easy to forget a wad or hull insertion which really slow things down. Shot spills can really gum up the works and must be cleared so that all parts can move fully.

The hopper drains are a great idea, shot and powder can be fully drained with the flip of a lever, just don't accidently open one or it is all over the bench. I thought the bushing measures would be a problem but they are really not, set it up, check weight and forget about it.

Make sure the machine is well attached to a good solid bench. The handle must be cycled fully each and every stroke and just clamping it to a light bench will not cut it.

I would think that a new machine with the factory setup would not have many of these problems. I know many have been made since the one I have was. They wouldn't sell at the price they are getting if all customers had an experince like mine. I kept at it becasue I am stubborn that way, most guys would sell it off and spread the word and that does not seem to be the case here.

I don't really know where I am going with all this. Maybe just needed to vent and saw my opportunity. Good loaders, can make good shells very fast, be ready to work at it though. Not for the casual loader.

Offline rbwillnj

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 349
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #2 on: October 05, 2006, 01:48:23 PM »
When I first contemplated reloading shot shells, I was convinced that a Ponsness Warren was the machine to have.   Anyting built like that had to be good.  I was very fortunate to have a friend who offered to loan me his 800B (in hopes that I would buy it).   What a disaster.  If you have a problem, you have to carefully clear the machine and start over.  I spent more time clearing than loading.  I'm sure that a number of the problems were my fault, but the machine is not very forgiving.   I ended up buying a Mec 9000GN, and am happy with the decision.

The latest Ponsness Warrens allow you to remove a shell from any station.  (the 800B does not)  That makes a big difference when you get in trouble.   I'm still picking up shot off the basement floor.

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #3 on: October 05, 2006, 01:53:29 PM »


I used a MEC 650 for 7 years then purchased a P/W LS1000.
The MEC is a good machine but the P/W is a great machine. The P/W is best in large volume rather than changing hulls or reciepes often.

Offline schutzen

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 55
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #4 on: October 11, 2006, 04:03:54 PM »
I have 2, an 800B and an 800 Convertible (plus). There is a learning curve, but any competent hand loader should be able master the adjustments in 1 or 2 loading sessions.  As previously commented, this is a volume machine.  1 Hull, 1 powder, 1 wad/shot size.  Once you are adjusted, start pumping them out.  My son and I loaded 4 flats of AA Clones last night.

I purchased the 800 Convertible because of the feature that allows you to remove a defective shell.  This usually happens with a bad hull. (I guess I should inspect them closer.)

The only real problem I have had with either machine is the primer feed.  If the primer feed chute is not full or nearly full, you have to watch the primers to insure 1 feeds in to the machine.

One option I would definitely get is the Shovel Handle; it beats the ball seven ways from Sunday.





Offline Catfish

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2696
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2006, 09:01:25 AM »
I have an 800 and a 900 that I built from parts. I find that the 800 is far less susceptiable to malfunction due to wear. While they are a real pain we you mess up something you will soon learn what not to do. Loading speed and accuracy are fantastic. If you load only 1 load you`ll only set it up once, but it no hard to to change bushing if you wish to change loads.

Offline Tusker

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 77
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #6 on: October 14, 2006, 11:25:28 AM »
Well I have 3 of their single stage presses. I started because of the price of 28 guage shells. Been awhile since I loaded any but just got in 1500 once fired AA hulls--- I think I am set for life. :) They do just fine for what I get a chance to do . :) Have thought REAL HARD about one of their presses to load for my MDL 52, but have too many irons in the fire right now. :)



TUSKER

Offline Selmer

  • Trade Count: (6)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 684
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2006, 08:35:19 AM »
I'm using a P/W 600B progressive that doesn't self-index.  There is definitely a learning curve, and you don't want distractions while you're reloading, I can tolerate distractions with a single-stage MEC, but this thing is an engineering marvel, and it is jut as easy to mess up as it is to pump out 100 shells every 20 minutes.  I'd say go for it, I love mine, just give yourself a few sessions and read the directions carefully beforing deciding it's a a very well made but too complicated to use machine.  If you know what you're doing reloading shells, 1-2 sessions will have you running smoothly.
Selmer
"Next to the glory of God, music deserves the highest praise"-Martin Luther
Any homo sapien with the proper chromosomes can be labeled a father, but it takes a man to be called "Daddy"-unknown

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2006, 11:42:13 AM »
Have you purchased a press yet?
My advice now is buy locally thru a place that will help you set it up using YOUR recipie and your hulls.
My phone calls to P/W have revieled what the Spolar fans like to say about the P/W, Great machine backed by weak support.

Offline myronman3

  • Moderator
  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4837
  • Gender: Male
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2006, 07:01:36 AM »
hey graybeard.... have you looked into dillon's shotshell reloader?  i know nothing of the shotshell loaders,  but if they are half of what the rifle/pistol loaders are,  they will be worth a look.  i cant imagine dillon being anything but slick as snot.   and i will guarentee that dillon's service will blow the doors off of what anyone else will do for you.    if i were you, i would contact dillon and request a shotshell press for review.  compare that to the p-w, then keep the one that works the best.   it is worth a shot anyway.....

Offline Myron_Holley

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 28
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #10 on: February 17, 2007, 02:03:36 AM »
 ;D Go with the Dillon. More than makes up for the cost.  Biggest problem with P.W. is the bushings replacement, What has happened is Mikes Hunting and Critter Supplies on E bay sells the adapter so you can use mec bushings on the P.W. again which are hard to find and costly. Will dillon you have the smoothness and easy to get bushings etc. Mike in Ohio and loving it even with the 15 inch snow at one time.

Offline Hairtrigger

  • Trade Count: (10)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2010
Re: Anyone use Ponsness-Warren loaders?
« Reply #11 on: February 17, 2007, 02:29:26 AM »
Use a dillon before you buy it.
It is a real disappointment compared to their rifle shell reloaders