well, here is my experience, in a nutshell.
i bought three sbh's over the last three years. all three broke in the same way; two within a day of each other-which happened to be the day before our early doe hunt. so there i sit, with the two guns i have been practicing with all year broken. add the cost of those guns together.
while waiting for my guns to get fixed, season comes, and goes. then our regular season is getting close. i found a deal on a used f.a. 44. got it all said and done for under $950. about 350 less than i have tied up in the rugers.
i enjoy shooting my pistols alot, and i take good care of my guns. the thing i can not tolerate is a gun not to work when i need it. one gun i could understand and chalk it up to a fluke. three? so i figure that as much as i have tied in ruger sbh's, a f.a. that i can count on is worth $950. fit and finish are flawless, it is obvious these guns are as close to perfectly made as can be. accuracy so far has been better than my rugers, but i have yet to have an opportunity to really put it through the ringer. i have seen very promising results so far.
i never thought i would own a f.a., rugers (i thought) would be all i ever needed. experience has taught me otherwise.
at this point i have gone through about every type and make of gun you can think of. there are only three that have never let me down. the first one is the kimber .45. rock solid, accurate as hell and never fails. the second is my contender. this sucker is as accurate as my rifle. the next is the f.a.; but i havent had much time to really use it. from what others tell me, it should have no problem staying on this list. but if the f.a. ever lets me down, i am selling my revolvers and quiting handgun hunting.
i am already in the process of downsizing my collection.