I live in MD, in a no-handgun hunting county. I just don't understand why it is okay to hunt with my 12 ga slug gun with a 260 grain slug at 1800 fps but I can't hunt with a pistol that would run 300-400 fps slower. In other counties you can hunt with a muzzleloading pistol... OK, I understand the "no-rifles" part in these counties (it's just too crowded here), but why not a .44 magnum pistol when I can hunt with an Omega that will shoot the same weight bullet 600-700 fps faster. Seems to be a contradiction. Maybe they need a "power-factor" (just a term, don't nit-pick me please). I mean, define an upper limit for velocity and mass and then let us use anything that will meet the limit. Does it really matter if a 300 grain bullet at 1400 fps comes from a shotgun, rifle, muzzleloader or a handgun?
mamerch