Author Topic: 1400 ??  (Read 1158 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Rogmatt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
1400 ??
« on: January 17, 2005, 01:53:33 AM »
Is the 1400 trash??  I recently bought one. I have not shot it yet.
Field & Stream just came out with their "50 greatest guns of all time" , and as a side blurb, they listed a few of the worst, including the Win. 1400.
If anyone has had one here for years and years, I would like to know what kind of service it has given them. Thanks for any feedback.

Offline RBishop

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 241
1400 ??
« Reply #1 on: January 17, 2005, 01:57:54 AM »
My dad bought me a 20 ga. model 1400 in the mid-70s. It was my first
auto-loading shotgun. 28" vent rib barrel, modified choke.  I still have it today.  I have hunted about any kind of small game, upland birds etc. that you can imagine.  It has been my primary dove gun all these years. I have found that as long as I keep it clean it performs without any problems.

Offline JPSaxMan

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1779
  • Gender: Male
1400 ??
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2005, 10:08:36 AM »
Yea I read that too. Don't believe everything you read :) . I don't know much about the gun, but from what someone else said, it sounds like a good gun.
JP

Attorney: Now doctor, isn't it true that when a person dies in
his sleep, he doesn't know about it until the next morning?

Doctor: Did you actually pass the bar exam?

Proverbs 3:5 - Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding

Offline Fullchoke

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 103
Rogmatt
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2005, 12:43:19 PM »
I hit the wrong button in response to your question. Rather than repeat my thoughts here, see my $.02 in a separate post "Winchester 1400".

Sorry 'bout that. :oops:

Offline old06

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 341
1400 ??
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2005, 02:00:45 PM »
I have the economical version the 140 since around 82 and have hunted and used it for trap and skeet quite a bit early on since it was my only shot gun. I haven't had any problems with it, it's not as nice as some others but I think I payed 115.00 for it and it had the win choke system to boot.
Psalm 16

Offline Doc4570

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11
1400
« Reply #5 on: January 18, 2005, 11:08:45 AM »
I bought mine new in the 70s and never had a problem.
Still shooting it today.  Never had a jam.

I think it's reputation took a beatin' because IIRC
it was the first model of the "post-1964" Winchesters.

Doc

Offline Rogmatt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
1400 ??
« Reply #6 on: January 18, 2005, 03:42:27 PM »
Thanks Gentlemen,  I will report back soon with my experience with it.

Offline Rogmatt

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Contributor
  • ***
  • Posts: 382
1400 ??
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2005, 01:54:28 AM »
QUESTION!!

I got the barrel back from the gunsmith. It was 28", and is now 27 1/4" with a very nice centered bead. It is gauged to be improved cylinder which is fine for clays & birds.
I have refinished the aluminum reciever , refinished the wood as well. My question is does the 1400 have a bolt buffer between the bolt and the back of the reciever like the Remington 58? There is a machined hole in the very back of the reciever that looks as if it would hold some type of buffer, but it did not come with one. I can see the imprints of the bolt on the very back of the reciever where it has made contact. Am I missing something or should I go ahead and reassemble. Thanks for any help. Will post pics soon.

Offline mjbgalt

  • Trade Count: (26)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2367
  • Gender: Male
1400 ??
« Reply #8 on: February 06, 2005, 04:37:40 AM »
my 1300 has such a buffer...i would think the 1400 would too since it has much more of a need for one. try numrich's website and see if they list a part number for one.

-Matt
I have it on good authority that the telepromter is writing a stern letter.