Author Topic: interbond or accubond?  (Read 978 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline thelaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 220
interbond or accubond?
« on: March 02, 2005, 02:38:15 AM »
i'm wanting to try out one of these 2 bullets in my .270 this coming fall on mule deer. can't make up my mind though. 130gr. hornday interbond or the 140gr. nosler accubond. any experience info or suggestions?

Offline Val

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
Interbond or Accubond
« Reply #1 on: March 02, 2005, 03:26:49 AM »
I use both with equally good results. It all depends on which one is made in the weight bullet I want to use.
Hunting and fishing are not matters of life or death. They are much more important than that.

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
interbond or accubond?
« Reply #2 on: March 02, 2005, 05:00:09 AM »
I'm just curious, what were you using in the past and why are you changing?
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]

Offline thelaw

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 220
interbond or accubond?
« Reply #3 on: March 02, 2005, 06:05:38 AM »
last year i used nosler 130gr. partitions and killed 2 muleys. shots were right at 300 and 337yards. one deer dropped in its tracks, while the other took one right in the boiler room and continued to walk around, requiring a second shot. don't get me wrong, i like the partition. the load i shoot clocks 3122fps and shoots .75" at 100 yards. just wanting to see how the bonded core bullets perform. i feel 130grainers are a little light for mule deer, but then i've read of people shooting elk with them so what do i know.

Offline Val

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 846
Previous Usage
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2005, 03:50:56 AM »
If the question regarding previous usage and why did I switch was directed at me, there are two reasons I switched.

1. The Interbonds and Accubonds give me slightly tighter groups.

2. The tips on the Partitions tend to get messed up with field usage and loading and unloading them from the magazine. The plastic tips on the Interbonds and Accubonds don't get messed up.
Hunting and fishing are not matters of life or death. They are much more important than that.

Offline Graybeard

  • Administrator
  • Trade Count: (69)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 26945
  • Gender: Male
interbond or accubond?
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2005, 04:03:42 AM »
Val, I'm not sure how that avatar of yours slid past the size limit but it is too large. I have disabled it. We have a size limit of 95x95 pixels on avatars. Please resize or use another.


Bill aka the Graybeard
President, Graybeard Outdoor Enterprises
256-435-1125

I am not a lawyer and do not give legal advice.

Jesus is the way, the truth, and the life anyone who believes in Him will have everlasting life!

Offline Don Fischer

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1526
interbond or accubond?
« Reply #6 on: March 04, 2005, 03:15:46 PM »
Val, Year's ago when Speer brought out the mag tip they showed photo's of a bullet leaving the barrel. The tip's melted off somewhere, I've no idea where they went. But american's like nice clean streamlined tip's, me included. But here awhile back I pulled some bullet's with an inertial puller and bunged up the tip's a bit so I set them aside. Later I loaded them up to pressure test with and guess what. I got fair three shot group! So just to see, I loaded up some more and they shot fine, I've no idea why as they were ugly. I don't know if it would happen again and no intention of buggering up some to see. Just found it interesting.

Boy, I just typed this whole thing in under 15 min and spell check say's it's ok! That's a first.
:wink: Even a blind squrrel find's an acorn sometime's![/quote]