Does anyone feel there are significant differences in the quality between pre-fire and post-fire contenders? If so, what do you feel those differences are? Let's not take into account the ugly "laughing cougar" head on the frame. The less said about that the better. Are the stainless models any more/less valuable than the blued? The reason I ask is because today I saw a stainless post-fire contender with 14" 7-30 Waters barrel in a small gunshop I stop into from time to time. It had a Pachmayr grip and forend, hammer extension, and a scope base and rings (but no scope). The grip looked less than new, I guess "faded" might be the best way to describe it, but otherwise the gun appeared in good shape. I had to judge these things through the glass of the display case as the gentleman working the counter was busy with another customer and I had to leave in order to get home in time to get my daughter off the school bus. $279 was the price on the tag. If the good people of this forum feel that this is a gun worth looking into further, I'll make the drive back to the gunshop as soon as I can. Please share your thoughts or opinions.