Thanks for the input - although I seemed to get more replys as to why I would use a relatively light load through a .454, and why not use .45 colt brass instead.
The first one is easy - light loads for practice. When working on my trigger control, site picture, etc. etc. and practicing while shooting 100 round + during a day of shooting - my personal limit is about 50 rounds of full house rounds before I start to flinch etc. The lighter rounds allow me to practice all day, without beating my hands or my nerves.
However, the second item brings up another question. Why not use .45LC in a .454 to save $$.
Back 25+ years ago, when I purchased my first .357, and then .44 mag - it was told to me that although I could use .38 special, and .44 special respectively, that in the long run, it was not a good idea for revolvers. The shorter brass, with the greater distance between the bullet and forcing cone, would shorten the life of a weapon, vs. using the cartridge that was intended for it. It was passed on to me from someone I highly respected - so I pretty much took it to heart. Anyways, what did it matter to me - reloading a .44 special took just as much time as a .44 mag. Primer, shell, and bullet cost the same. Power difference in a box was down to pennies.
So here is my question - will the use of cartridges shorter than what the gun was designed for have a detrimental effect over the long term?