Author Topic: 300 savage (Read 1553 times)

msorenso · « **on:** October 07, 2005, 03:27:44 AM »

Does savage chamber in 300 savage

??

Zeke Menuar · « **Reply #1 on:** October 07, 2005, 09:29:42 AM »

savageT · « **Reply #2 on:** October 07, 2005, 10:20:30 AM »

msorenso,
The Savage Arms Company dropped chambering .300Savage about 1971. Remaining calibers were limited to .243 and .308.

Jim

msorenso · « **Reply #3 on:** October 09, 2005, 03:45:06 AM »

Thanks!

BULLMASTIFF · « **Reply #4 on:** October 12, 2005, 05:53:53 AM »

They should though.

BULLMASTIFF · « **Reply #5 on:** October 12, 2005, 05:55:58 AM »

They should though.

IntrepidWizard · « **Reply #6 on:** October 12, 2005, 06:02:44 AM »

Excellent round and should have been the Military round starting in 1940 into the 50's prior to the 308 it was light,accurate and had excellent ballistics.

Idaho_Hick · « **Reply #7 on:** October 12, 2005, 02:02:21 PM »

Wizard
Are you implying that my government wasted millions of dollars to develop and test a round instead of using existing technology?
I really find it hard to believe they would be so foolish! :-D

Ron T. · « **Reply #8 on:** October 23, 2005, 12:56:45 PM »

Actually, the U.S. Government tested the .300 Savage cartridge and, from the information I've read, they were ready to approve it's adoption as the standard U.S. cartridge to replace the .30/06 when they decided to "improve" it.

The "improvement" became known as the 7.62 NATO round aka the Winchester .308 cartridge.

Thus, you might say our Government used "existing technology"... sorta.... in a "left-handed" way... kinda. :-D

Strength & Honor...

Ron T.