Author Topic: Nikon Buckmasters vs Weaver GrandSlam (Read 1377 times)

jason280 · « **on:** September 12, 2005, 12:05:28 PM »

Which would be a better scope? I know the LT for the Buckmasters is rated at 92%, but I'm not sure for the Weaver. I'm looking at the 4.5-14x40AO models of each, but cannot decide. Thanks!

Redhawk1 · « **Reply #1 on:** September 12, 2005, 12:30:10 PM »

Given the choice you gave, I would get the Nikon Buckmasters. The Nikon is a better quality scope in my opinion.

TheOpticZone · « **Reply #2 on:** September 13, 2005, 01:00:31 AM »

That is tough one. They are both a great scope, but I personally would say the Weaver Grand Slam is a ever so slightly better scope. But the Nikon Buckmaster is going to save you money and you will not tell much of a difference, so I would probably go with the Nikon.

Zachary · « **Reply #3 on:** September 13, 2005, 04:59:10 PM »

Both are good, buy my vote goes for Nikon Buckmaster.

However, the Grand Slam is about the same price as the Monarch, so I would definately recommend the Monarch. And Jon should know, because while I buy many scopes from the optic zone, 90% of my purchases are either Nikon Monarchs or Bushnell Elite 4200s. Sounds about right John?

Zachary