Author Topic: 7mm-08  (Read 697 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline cridertj

  • Trade Count: (1)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 169
  • Gender: Male
  • the boys first critter
7mm-08
« on: June 29, 2008, 12:04:34 PM »
I know this sounds stupid but how much different is there between this and 3006?

Offline Varmint Hunter

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 665
Re: 7mm-08
« Reply #1 on: June 29, 2008, 12:46:19 PM »
"Different" in what respect?

Offline PA-Joe

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 980
Re: 7mm-08
« Reply #2 on: June 29, 2008, 12:58:09 PM »
They are pretty close to each other. The 7mms have a high BC and therefore shoot a little flater. Problem with the 7mm is that you are limited to a 175 grain bullet while the 308s give you 200+. Some say the 7mm is too light for elk. It's great for the east coast where you shots are less than 300 yards.

Offline BBF

  • GBO Supporter
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10042
  • Gender: Male
  • I feel much better now knowing it will get worse.
Re: 7mm-08
« Reply #3 on: June 29, 2008, 02:08:36 PM »
The first loading from Remington was with a 140 gr bullet. IMO that should give you an idea where to go. 175's are probably to heavy or too long to be seated without loosing powder capacity. Your single shot will give you some extra leeway there. The 7x57 is similar in performance if loaded to the full potential.
What is the point of Life if you can't have fun.

Offline yooper77

  • Trade Count: (33)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1746
  • Gender: Male
Re: 7mm-08
« Reply #4 on: June 30, 2008, 06:08:09 AM »
7mm-08 Remington vs. 30-06 Springfield, not a fair comparison.

7mm-08 Remington vs. 308 Winchester splitting hairs.
280 Remington vs. 30-06 Springfield splitting hairs.

Either one is good, depends on your choice of caliber, desired bullet weight.

yooper77