45-70 vs 500 S&W?....again! :roll:
http://www.graybeardoutdoors.com/phpbb2/viewtopic.php?p=448931&highlight=#448931
YEA, we don't need to go there!!
I wasn't tyring to debate the 500 S&W VS the 45-70. Only debate the thought process/comment that its only a pistol round. My reasoning is, if a person would look at the stats an proven round. One that has a known performance record. That is close in paper stats to a unproven cartridge. You will get an IDEA as to how it may perform.
I have seen the thread where the author chronos a couple bullet weights/handloads but did not see many different powders used. I think with the correct powder this cartridges performance can be enhanced quite substantally.
In my 357 mag, 357 MAXI and my 45COLT loads get quite a boost in velocity and energy when shot from my rifle barrels, compared to my revolvers.
The MAXI, w/180gr bullets gets about 1500fps or so from the 10 contender bbl, yet with 1680 powder and the same bullet it tops 2200 fps from the 22" handi barrel!!
My 45 COLTS 300gr load, I am getting almost 1200fps yet in my 16" Marlin this tops 1600fps and out of the 20" tube 1750fps. This is all with WW296 powder.
Even my 45ACP even gets a boost from a 16" barrel, although nowhere near as substantial and if +p loads are not used the velocity actually goes down. But the capacity of this round is the problem, you simply cannot get enough powder into this case to make it perform. Rem 185gr +P Golden sabers get me almost 1500 fps from a 16" barrel, yet only clock at 1050 from my 5" GOVT model.
This is my basis for my reasoning that I can get better stats from a rifle barrel with the 500 S&W. Not only is the published state from shorter barrels, they are VENTED barrels. Like other magnums have you seen the flash? Thats wasted power, power that will be utilised from a longer, non vented barrel.
Currently, I have a couple different loads ready to go, once I get a couple more I'll head to the range with my chrono and I'll be sure to post my results...good or bad!!
CW