Author Topic: DC - Dangerous aim  (Read 402 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline FWiedner

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Senior Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1686
DC - Dangerous aim
« on: November 21, 2005, 04:17:09 AM »
Dangerous aim

Congress should stop Souder, NRA from meddling with a local law

The Washington Post - Not satisfied to be a Republican congressman from Indiana, Rep. Mark Edward Souder also enjoys assuming the role of D.C. Council member, a role in which he — with guidance from the National Rifle Association — can try to decide which laws should be on the District of Columbia’s books. Last year Mr. Souder and the NRA tried, but failed, to destroy the ability of D.C. leaders to enact anti-gun laws. They are at it again, drawing a bead on the city’s gun-safety laws. Unless respect for the rights of D.C. residents to make their own laws — and common sense about gun safety — prevails on Capitol Hill, by week’s end the city’s sensible and broadly supported gun-safety law will be history. Congress must not let that happen.

We know it matters not a whit to Mr. Souder and the NRA that every D.C. mayor and D.C. Council member has supported the local law passed in 1976 that required registration of all firearms and prohibited new handgun registrations. The law also required gun owners with firearms at home to store their weapons disassembled or with a trigger lock. Mr. Souder and his friends at the NRA prefer that people keep unlocked and loaded shotguns or rifles in their homes, so they added an amendment to the House version of the D.C. appropriations bill that prevents the city from enforcing its safe-storage requirements. The Senate didn’t include such a reckless provision in its version of the bill. This week, a conference committee will meet to reconcile the bills’ differences. If the Senate’s conferees hold firm, the city will be spared the nightmare that is sure to come from loaded and unlocked guns falling into the hands of children.

That scary picture is borne out in a study published by the journal Pediatrics in September: "Approximately 90 percent of fatal firearm incidents involving children occur within the home, and according to a study of children and youth aged 0 to 14 years ... 40 percent of firearm incidents involve a firearm stored in the room in which the shooting occurs." In direct contradiction to the Souder-NRA amendment, the study found that "safe storage practices, including keeping firearms stored unloaded, locked, or separate from ammunition, are associated with significant reductions in the risk of unintentional injuries and suicides among children and youth."

But Mr. Souder is as ready to ignore evidence as he is to undermine local democracy. Congress should not go along.

http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2005/1109/edit/edit.htm

...and, a response to the above opinion...

Post editorial abominable

The disgusting and abominable anti-gun editorial from the Washington Post, "Dangerous aim" (Mail Tribune, Nov. 9),was blatantly vile! It’s obvious these Marxist/Leninist editors care nothing about the working class, women, minorities or anyone except themselves.
Washington, D.C.’s murder rate escalated 300 percent in the 15 years following this damnable 1976 handgun ban. Yet, what are defenseless and common class crime victims to these political elitists of the Washington Post rag? After all, their elitist butts are probably protected 24/7 by armed bodyguards via taxpayers’ expense. And in an urban jungle where the democratic political machine maintains oppressive Mafia-style control, and is operated by political gangsters.

Sensible gun laws? What a deceptive and dishonest farce! Like seat belt laws, this is "people control legislation" and isn’t benevolent, benign and for the common good! No way! Washington, D.C., Chicago, New York City and now San Francisco deserve top honors as metro sloughs and America’s crime capitals, including the congressional thieves (both political parties), crooks, socialists and extortionists who reside there! The pro-gun Web site www.keepandbeararms.com has a lot to say about this. — James A. Farmer, Ashland

http://www.mailtribune.com/archive/2005/1120/edit/let.htm

.
They may talk of a "New Order" in the  world, but what they have in mind is only a revival of the oldest and worst tyranny.   No liberty, no religion, no hope.   It is an unholy alliance of power and pelf to dominate and to enslave the human race.

Offline swiftman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Avid Poster
  • **
  • Posts: 187
DC - Dangerous aim
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2005, 03:28:01 PM »
I don't under stand your stand on storing guns in the home? do you believe that our guns should be locked up or stored seperate from the ammunition so it won't be availible when whenwe really need it in a hurry.LikeWhen they come to take them away they won't have to worry because you have them all locked up.  What is your view on this?
I only think tha they should be kept ouy of reach until they are old enough to be shown the results of what will happen if they are caught even thinking about touching them without adult supervision. The guns weren't locked up in our home when I grew up and some of them are not in my home. They ere only locked up when  we are all gone from home.
What makes it different than it was 40years ago?  
I would not believe a word that the Journal Of Pediatrics or any anti gun orginzation say about gun related deaths.

Offline fe352v8

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • A Real Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 700
  • Gender: Male
  • Evolve or become extinct
DC - Dangerous aim
« Reply #2 on: November 21, 2005, 08:04:44 PM »
Guns are the least of your worries

I got these numbers from the Illinois Council Against Handgun Violence (ichv.org), not exactly a pro-gun group.

In 2002 there were 30,242 gun deaths in the United States, of those:

17,108 or 56% were suicides
11,829 or 39% were homicides
    762  or  3 % were unintentional
    543  or  2% were legal interventions (300), or undetermined intent (243).

By comparison according to the Center for Disease Control, doctors and hospitals accounted for approximately a total of 225,000 deaths in the same year

106,000 deaths due to adverse effects to properly prescribed medications
  80,000 deaths due to nosocomial infections in hospitals
  20,000 deaths due to other hospital errors  
  12,000 deaths due to unnecessary surgery
    7,000 deaths due to medication errors in hospitals

For most of us, the situation that presents the greatest exposure to violent injury or death statistically is entering into a domestic relationship.  Home is where the heart and the homicide is.

The only category where a gun is the major cause of death is suicide, and eliminating them is not going to decrease suicides.    In fact if guns were eliminated, unsuccessful suicide attempts would in all probability increase.  However, judging by the state of medicine the majority of those intent on suicide would ultimately succeed anyway due to their being hospitalized to treat the injuries sustained in an unsuccessful suicide attempt.

Life is no joke but funny things happen

jon
life is no joke but funny things happen

jon